[theme-reviewers] Theme shops inside end user's website!

Chip Bennett chip at chipbennett.net
Sat Jan 11 14:20:51 UTC 2014


The answer for the second is definitive: Themes *MUST* be fully
self-contained. Hotlinking images and/or pulling in untrusted data from an
external site are absolutely prohibited.

(The only current exception is proper use of APIs, such as Google Fonts.)


On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 9:14 AM, Zulfikar Nore <zulfikarnore at live.com>wrote:

> No not missing anything on the first one - I gave that one as an example
> of having someone else's content hosted inside end user's site.
>
> The second one is given as not being self contained i.e. pulling in
> resources:
>
> http://themes.svn.wordpress.org/invert-lite/1.0.1/SketchBoard/includes/sketchtheme-upsell.php
>
> I could have worded both instance separately and better I guess :)
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:12:14 +0530
>
> From: tskk79 at gmail.com
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme shops inside end user's website!
>
> I don't see them pulling any external content :
>
> http://themes.svn.wordpress.org/golden-eagle-lite/1.6/functions/themes-page.php
> or am i missing something?
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 7:06 PM, Zulfikar Nore <zulfikarnore at live.com>wrote:
>
> A definitive guide on what is "proper use" is required so that both
> authors and reviewers know where the line is.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: rohitink at live.com
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 19:03:53 +0530
>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme shops inside end user's website!
>
> I think reviewers should be allowed to use their own judgement on this
> matter, whether the option is being abused or properly used.
>
> ------------------------------
> From: zulfikarnore at live.com
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 13:32:21 +0000
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme shops inside end user's website!
>
> I think that decision needs to be looked at again as this option is open
> to and is being abused!
>
> ------------------------------
> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2014 18:45:09 +0530
> From: tskk79 at gmail.com
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme shops inside end user's website!
>
> Having additional page for theme author's other themes was said to be okay
> previously.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 6:40 PM, Zulfikar Nore <zulfikarnore at live.com>wrote:
>
> Hello team,
>
> I'm currently reviewing two themes as follow:
> https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/15856
> https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/15945
>
> Both these themes add a secondary page on the Appearance section.
> My understanding is that themes can only add "One" theme page and as many
> tabs as they like.
> But this point has been argued strongly for and against - we still need
> clarification though!
>
> My main concern is that both themes are using these secondary pages to
> advertise their shop's
> other theme - I class this as unrelated items to the active theme and
> again this needs clarification
> on weather we allow it or not.
>
> But a bigger concern is that in both cases (most likely many other authors
> are doing it too) these
> pages are pulling in content from external sources i.e. author's site and
> planting it in the end user's
> site. Effectively what they have is their shops inside someone else's
> site. For me this is overdoing it
> and I feel that it must not be allowed.
>
> Your views please
>
> Regards,
> Zulf
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers mailing
> list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers mailing
> list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers mailing
> list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers mailing
> list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140111/1e5f4700/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list