[theme-reviewers] question on widget areas

[Justin Tadlock]

Nope, it's never been needed.  Of course, the header area is pretty 
clear.  Other areas might not be.

On 4/6/2011 12:25 PM, Chip Bennett wrote:
> Does the Theme provide documentation (e.g. readme.txt) explaining the 
> design intent/limitations for the Widget Areas?
>
> Chip
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 12:15 PM, Justin Tadlock 
> <justin at justintadlock.com <mailto:justin at justintadlock.com>> wrote:
>
>     Sometimes, it may just be part of the design.  The most common
>     area with this would be a header widget.  Headers may often have a
>     limited height and only support something the size of an
>     advertisement image.  I've done this a few times in the past few
>     years and haven't once had a user ask why they couldn't add more
>     stuff.  It just made sense to them.
>
>
>     On 4/6/2011 7:54 AM, Edward Caissie wrote:
>>     Also take into consideration, as you noted, this may be by
>>     design. Did the author already make reference to this in the
>>     Theme's documentation?
>>
>>
>>     Sent from my iPhone ... Cais.
>>
>>     On Apr 6, 2011, at 5:33 AM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com
>>     <mailto:emil at themeid.com>> wrote:
>>
>>>     Another thing, if I may add. When testing units you should do
>>>     that in several different browsers IE7+, Chrome, FF etc, in all
>>>     an each of them the design should look good, without any
>>>     rendering issues. IE6 is 'dead' so that you do not have to.
>>>
>>>     On Apr 6, 2011 4:28 AM, "Emil Uzelac" <emil at themeid.com
>>>     <mailto:emil at themeid.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>>     If something is cut-off or not displayed properly, sure you may
>>>     report that as well.
>>>
>>>>
>>>>     >
>>>>     > On Apr 6, 2011 3:42 AM, "carolina n" <myazalea at hotmail.com
>>>>     <mailto:myazalea at hotmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>     >
>>>>     >
>>>>     > All widgets must dis...
>>>>
>>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>>     theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>     theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>     <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>>     http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>     _______________________________________________
>>>     theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>     theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>     <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>>     http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     theme-reviewers mailing list
>>     theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org  <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>>     http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     theme-reviewers mailing list
>     theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>     <mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>     http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110407/b9d71f55/attachment.htm>