[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #61269: Plugin Dependencies: Add filter to restore auto-redirect after plugin activation
WordPress Trac
noreply at wordpress.org
Wed May 22 15:19:15 UTC 2024
#61269: Plugin Dependencies: Add filter to restore auto-redirect after plugin
activation
-----------------------------+--------------------
Reporter: hellofromTonya | Owner: (none)
Type: defect (bug) | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.5.4
Component: Upgrade/Install | Version: 6.5
Severity: normal | Keywords:
Focuses: |
-----------------------------+--------------------
To address the problems (see below) while minimizing risks in a minor,
this ticket proposes adding a mechanism (i.e. a filter) for plugins to
register their onboarding | set up | configure URL for Core to handle the
auto-redirects after activation. This filter will be forward-compatible by
design as the entry point into the onboarding framework (see #61040).
@costdev @jorbin are co-collaborators on this proposal, following
discussions with and data gathering from @beaulebens @adrianduffell
@nerrad @illuminea @smub to better understand the impacts and user
insights.
== Problem Statements:
Plugin companies and their users (which are also this project's users) are
significantly impacted.
It's unknown if the majority of users want or do not want auto-redirect.
It's now known that impacted plugin's users do want this ability. The size
of their user bases is data to suggest the significance of the impact.
A new onboarding framework needs the benefits of major release cycle to
understand the impacts, form a scope, do experiments, and then move
through the product | enhancement stages.
=== More Context:
As of WP 6.5.0, users are no longer able to quickly go from install to
onboarding | set up | configure. Plugin companies are significantly
impacted, reporting decreases of 18-30% in users moving to the next step
(which helps users use the plugin). The 6.5.3 new "Refresh now" user
action (an additional user action) appears to reduce the impacts, though
are still significant.
An enhancement ticket is open for exploring an onboarding framework (see
#61040).
The Plugins Dependencies (aka PD) feature made a technical and design
decision for its workflow. In talking with @costdev, the feature did not
set out to ban redirects after activation. Jorbin summarized the feature's
problem statement as:
>The problem PD aims to solve is that when a plugin has a dependency on
another, users are left to their devices which leads to inconsistent user
experiences and potential for site breakage by deactivating plugins that
are relied upon
Notice, the problem statement does not mention or include redirects or
onboarding. The hard removal of autoloading onboarding seems to be a
byproduct of the decided workflow.
Please note, the decision was thoughtfully made. With no issue reports or
feedback during the calls for testing and 6.5 alpha, beta, and RC cycles,
there did not seem to be an issue.
Fast forward to today, feedback has been shared showing the decision is
causing a significant impacts.
In hindsight with what is known today, the onboarding framework and PD
feature should have shipped together.
== Proposal
With this new understanding, this ticket proposes to:
* In a 6.5.x minor, give plugins a mechanism (filter) to register their
URL for Core to handle the redirect. To minimize risks in a minor, the
scope is essentially an "opt-out" by using a filter that will become part
of the onboarding framework.
* In 6.6 major, the mechanism becomes the entry point into the onboarding
framework.
* Then deal with the scope and impacts of a possible new onboarding
framework and/or workflow in a major release, i.e. to give time for
discussion, consideration, experimentation, feedback, adoption, etc.
== Proposal Technical Details
* In 6.5.4:
* add a new filter `plugin_configuration_data_{$slug}` for the
onboarding/configuration URL, with an initial parameter value of `array(
'url' => '' )`.
* if filtered, it auto-redirects to that URL after activation.
* In 6.6:
* the filter is the entry point into the onboarding framework.
* the filter's array is extended for the needs of the onboarding
framework.
* evaluate combining Install/Activate on the Plugins > Add New Plugin
screen to mitigate the 3-click approach created by the new button.
== Pros 🟢 and Cons 🔴 Summary
* 🟢 Temporarily restores a way to trigger auto-loading onboarding in a
minor (without a revert).
* 🟢 AJAX is retained, thus does not impact users or plugins authors when
activating plugins not using the filter.
* 🟢 Impacts the majority of users activating plugins who are early
adopters of PD, given the majority of early adopters require flagship
plugins with large user bases that require user setup for usage.
* ⚪️ Is forward-compatible by design, with a clear direction for the
future.
* 🟢 Less risk in a minor, while shifting design decisions to a major.
* 🟢 Less opinionated in a minor, moving the design decisions to a major.
* 🔴 Gives plugins a way to prevent users from completing the users
intended action
== Why not revert?
Good question, one that was thoughtfully and seriously considered.
A full revert of the Plugins Dependencies (PD) feature will potentially
cause a backwards compatible (BC) break. Why? It shipped public functions,
classes, etc that are available for invoking and extending in plugins. If
any plugins are currently invoking or extending, the user will experience
a fatal error.
A partial revert of the AJAX will impact users using a plugin that adopted
the feature.
Thus, a revert also impacts users.
In contrast, this ticket's proposal of adding a filter is a pragmatic,
forward-compatible approach to benefit users (including extenders).
== References
Follow-up to:
* #60992 [58081] [58083] (6.5.3)
* #22316 [57545] (6.5.0).
Related to #61040.
--
Ticket URL: <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/61269>
WordPress Trac <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress publishing platform
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list