[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #55443: Create WebP sub-sizes and use for output
WordPress Trac
noreply at wordpress.org
Tue Sep 13 22:09:12 UTC 2022
#55443: Create WebP sub-sizes and use for output
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: adamsilverstein | Owner:
| adamsilverstein
Type: enhancement | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone: 6.1
Component: Media | Version: 6.0
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: has-unit-tests needs-dev-note | Focuses:
needs-docs needs-user-docs has-patch | performance
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by CyberCr33p):
Replying to [comment:137 eatingrules]:
> Replying to [comment:135 spacedmonkey]:
> > Just a thought. How about this.
> >
> > Allow users to upload jpgs are normal. Add a warning / check in the
editor. Something like.
> >
> > “It appears you are using images that are not optimised, would you
like to optimise them?”
> >
> > Then when you click okay, covert images to webp and remove jpeg
version.
> >
> > Then add a check setting to “optimise all images by default”.
>
> Interesting idea. Maybe a bit clunky, but at least this way it's not
just creating extra images in the background with a site owner oblivious
to what's going on, and instead gives them control and can help them make
an informed decision.
>
> It seems to me that all the concerns people have raised that haven't
been addressed yet could be solved in one of two ways:
>
> 1. Overhaul how WordPress deals with thumbnails, generating as-needed on
first use. (A huge undertaking, but would be an awesome outcome!). This
would provide plenty of headroom for ''both'' JPG and WebP files to be
saved to disk as-needed.
>
> 2. Add an option in the Media Settings, **disabled by default**, that
can enable WebP generation... it could explain both the pros and cons so
people can decide what's best for them. There could even be a dashboard
notification suggesting people turn it on.
As a webhost hosting many thousand of wordpress websites I agree 100% with
everything you said.
I would like only to add these:
1. Servers will use more CPU to create the extra images. More CPU usage =
more energy cost
2. More servers will needed for webhosting / keeping backups. More servers
= more energy cost
3. Webhosting customers in many cases will have to pay more to host their
websites.
4. Developers will spend a lot of time to remove the webp images and
disable this "feature".
--
Ticket URL: <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/55443#comment:198>
WordPress Trac <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress publishing platform
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list