[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #56293: Use 'MINUTE_IN_SECONDS' for consistency in 'update.php' file

WordPress Trac noreply at wordpress.org
Sun Jul 31 20:01:03 UTC 2022


#56293: Use 'MINUTE_IN_SECONDS' for consistency in 'update.php' file
------------------------------------+-------------------------------
 Reporter:  hztyfoon                |       Owner:  audrasjb
     Type:  defect (bug)            |      Status:  reviewing
 Priority:  low                     |   Milestone:  6.1
Component:  Administration          |     Version:
 Severity:  normal                  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  has-patch dev-feedback  |     Focuses:  coding-standards
------------------------------------+-------------------------------
Changes (by costdev):

 * keywords:  has-patch => has-patch dev-feedback


Comment:

 > in the case of 90, wouldn't "plain 90 with an added comment beside it"
 be better than 1.5 * MINUTE_IN_SECONDS? [note: `90` exceeds `59`] Any
 thought?

 I think that's a fair point. "90 seconds" is more commonly used than "one
 and a half minutes" or "a minute and a half". While it breaks the
 consistency of `exceeds 59`, I believe it's the only edge case.

 That would mean, going forward, we would have (constant names are
 obviously not real, just examples):

 {{{#!php
 <?php
 define( 'WAIT', 5 ); // 5 seconds

 define( 'RETRYING_IN', 10 ); // 10 seconds

 define( 'UNZIP_TIMEOUT', 30 ); // 30 seconds

 define( 'DB_UPGRADE_TIMEOUT', MINUTE_IN_SECONDS );

 define( 'UNDERWATER_TIMEOUT', 90 ); // 90 seconds

 define( 'FREE_PIZZA_TIMEOUT', 30 * MINUTE_IN_SECONDS );

 define( 'ONE_HOUR_PHOTO_TIMEOUT', HOUR_IN_SECONDS );
 }}}

 What does everyone think of that format?

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/56293#comment:26>
WordPress Trac <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress publishing platform


More information about the wp-trac mailing list