[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #35357: Introduce did_filter()
WordPress Trac
noreply at wordpress.org
Fri Jan 8 02:33:36 UTC 2016
#35357: Introduce did_filter()
-------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: mordauk | Owner: chriscct7
Type: enhancement | Status: accepted
Priority: normal | Milestone: 4.5
Component: Plugins | Version:
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: needs-patch | Focuses:
-------------------------+------------------------
Changes (by nacin):
* keywords: has-patch has-unit-tests commit => needs-patch
Comment:
If we are to do this, I wonder if it should just be an alias of
`did_action()` and use `$wp_actions`. That would mimic `current_filter()`
and `add_filter()` behavior as well, making it clear they share the same
namespace.
I've never seen much utility for this, because filters are often run in
different, repeated contexts, rather than a single-time action. But I
[https://twitter.com/chriscct7/status/685283538007134208 stand corrected]
and I'm not against adding it.
This requires unit tests, and preferably ones that would catch that the
increment is currently in the wrong spot. If you had 4 callbacks tied to
the `test_did_filter` filter, calling `apply_filters( 'test_did_filter' );
var_dump( did_filter( 'test_did_filter' );` would return 4, not 1.
> If run after a filter is run, returns the number of functions that ran
on the filter. If run in a function attached to a filter, returns the
number of functions that have run on the filter before the current
function. This works the same ways as did_action does, but for filters.
That is not how `did_action()` works. :-)
--
Ticket URL: <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/35357#comment:7>
WordPress Trac <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress publishing platform
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list