[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #36335: Next generation: core autoloader proposal

[WordPress Trac]

#36335: Next generation: core autoloader proposal
-----------------------------+------------------
 Reporter:  dnaber-de        |       Owner:
     Type:  feature request  |      Status:  new
 Priority:  normal           |   Milestone:  4.7
Component:  General          |     Version:
 Severity:  normal           |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  has-patch        |     Focuses:
-----------------------------+------------------

Comment (by GaryJ):

 Replying to [comment:80 wonderboymusic]:
 > 1) to avoid collision, I say we name it `wp-vendor` and leave it outside
 `wp-includes`

 As I was reading the last few comments, `wp-vendor` at the top level is
 what sprung to mind for me too, so I'm +1 to this if top-level `vendor` is
 a no-go.


 Any reason for selecting `1.*` as the version for `xrstf/composer-php52`,
 instead of `^1.0`? Composer
 [https://getcomposer.org/doc/articles/versions.md#caret lists] the latter
 as being "the recommended operator for maximum interoperability when
 writing library code."

--
Ticket URL: <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/36335#comment:82>
WordPress Trac <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress publishing platform