[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #34678: Responsive Images: Check if content images already have a sizes attribute
WordPress Trac
noreply at wordpress.org
Tue Nov 24 08:10:04 UTC 2015
#34678: Responsive Images: Check if content images already have a sizes attribute
----------------------------+------------------------
Reporter: jaspermdegroot | Owner: joemcgill
Type: defect (bug) | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone: 4.4
Component: Media | Version: trunk
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: has-patch | Focuses:
----------------------------+------------------------
Comment (by azaozz):
Replying to [comment:14 joemcgill]:
I'm also not 100% on what is best but tend to prefer that we treat the
`srcset` and `sizes` attributes as a group.
On one side `sizes` is a standard attribute for `<img>` tags and we
shouldn't restrict the users that want to use it. On the other side it is
redundant without `srcset`, i.e. it can be considered a user error to have
`sizes` but not `srcset` in an `<img>` tag.
> The main concern addressed in r35678 was to ensure we didn't add an
additional sizes attribute whenever someone had already added a custom
sizes attribute in the post editor.
This is also addressed in 34678.2.diff but instead of accepting the
standalone sizes attr, it bypasses the image tag and doesn't add srcset.
I.e. keeps the content exactly as the user has entered it.
> That said, if restricting the use of standalone `sizes` attributes is
the goal, would we be better off stripping those `sizes` attributes when
the post is saved?
Don't think we should remove standalone sizes attributes as they are not
technically "invalid", they are just "useless". There shouldn't be a
reason to add them without adding srcset in the first place.
--
Ticket URL: <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/34678#comment:15>
WordPress Trac <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress publishing platform
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list