[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #24067: TinyMCE 4.0

[WordPress Trac]

#24067: TinyMCE 4.0
-------------------------+-----------------------
 Reporter:  josh401      |       Owner:  azaozz
     Type:  enhancement  |      Status:  accepted
 Priority:  high         |   Milestone:  3.9
Component:  TinyMCE      |     Version:  3.8
 Severity:  minor        |  Resolution:
 Keywords:               |     Focuses:
-------------------------+-----------------------

Comment (by josh401):

 Replying to [comment:43 azaozz]:

 > - Should we switch to the jQuery TinyMCE build? As TinyMCE also uses
 Sizzle, it can use the one included in jQuery, so its size will be reduced
 a bit. We require jQuery for both DFW and wpLink, but the basic TinyMCE
 outputted from `WP_Editor` can still be used without jQuery.

 I hope it's not to late to cast a vote here... but after digging into my
 tinymce addons, I've realized how much nicer it would be to have jQuery
 built-in.

 The size of the 4.0.16 TinyMCE non-jQuery build is 280KB; the jQuery build
 is 274KB.  Lighter is better.. Yes??

 Andrew, your pay grade is WAY above mine.. so I'm not sure I understand
 the implications of using the jQuery build within the scope of WordPress.

 However... my vote is definitely to include the jQuery version.  It makes
 developing additional plugins a breeze.  And, if it still retains it's
 original functionality... even better.

 What would be any downsides to using the jQuery build?

--
Ticket URL: <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/24067#comment:111>
WordPress Trac <https://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress publishing platform