[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #18660: Enhance rel_canonical function, add filter
WordPress Trac
wp-trac at lists.automattic.com
Wed May 2 05:21:15 UTC 2012
#18660: Enhance rel_canonical function, add filter
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: nathanrice | Owner:
Type: enhancement | joostdevalk
Priority: normal | Status: assigned
Component: Canonical | Milestone: Awaiting
Severity: normal | Review
Keywords: has-patch needs-testing 2nd-opinion | Version: 3.3
| Resolution:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by nacin):
I've applied this patch, merged it with HEAD, and gone over each line of
code. And I've done this no fewer than four times in the last six weeks. I
can't bring myself to commit the whole thing at this point, and for two
main reasons.
* I think adding rel=canonical to non-singular pages need some very
careful consideration. get_current_archive_url() sounds like a fantastic
idea in theory, but it could be damaging to a complicated site pretty
easily.
I am worried about how a complicated drill-down URL (say, with multiple
taxonomies, or a query string, or something else) would end up with an
improper canonical link. This is perhaps the greatest issue when it comes
to archive pages, and that's likely the only reason why we stuck to
singular the first time around.
* I think the pagination aspects (both rel=canonical respecting
pagination, and rel=next/prev handling pagination) is much more solid. I
think it has the potential to cause problems for non-singular pages, but
probably not as bad as a faulty rel=canonical could.
However, I am irked that the patch avoids using any API functions for
creating pagination links, and instead calculates them on their own. I
understand this is of no fault of the patch — rather, our APIs around
pagination links (both singular "page" links and archive "paged" links)
are all over the place.
There are also a number of filters and hooks scattered about these
functions, which make me question things like pagination bases and other
points of customization that could break. I would like to go through these
functions, potentially in 3.5, and clean them up, and make them obvious
about what is going on.
The one thing that seems most safe is a single, targeted patch that adds
support for singularly paginated items to rel_canonical(). And it is
getting too late in the cycle to make such changes, so I would rather try
to do all of this in one effort for 3.5. Sorry, yoast.
--
Ticket URL: <http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/18660#comment:27>
WordPress Trac <http://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress blogging software
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list