[wp-trac] Re: [WordPress Trac] #10190: Plugin Dependency Class API
WordPress Trac
wp-trac at lists.automattic.com
Thu Jun 18 06:33:01 GMT 2009
#10190: Plugin Dependency Class API
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Reporter: ShaneF | Owner: ShaneF
Type: task (blessed) | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.9
Component: Plugins | Version: 2.9
Severity: normal | Keywords:
----------------------------+-----------------------------------------------
Comment(by mikeschinkel):
@Denis-de-Bernardy: I defintely agree that adding a header field in the
plugin is the proper way to notate the existence of a dependency. I even
stated so here on an email send earlier than your reply above:
http://groups.google.com/group/wp-hackers/msg/901897eb28ebb4b2
Differences from what I read in your comments are 1.) I'm proposing the
header field to denote the name to be used to bootstrap validation code
(vs. writing prose in a readme) and 2.) I'm proposing more granular named
"interfaces" vs. simple "dependencies." Those differences, documented in
the thread, add a significant number of capabilities over mere prose.
@ShaneF: I also replied on the wp-hackers list:
http://groups.google.com/group/wp-hackers/msg/1195e1c980cce436
In summary I think it'd be best to revisit your concept and join forces
using your dependency work with the "interfaces" concept we've been
discussing on the wp-hackers list.
--
Ticket URL: <http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/10190#comment:9>
WordPress Trac <http://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress blogging software
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list