[wp-trac] [WordPress Trac] #9674: Better support for custom post types
WordPress Trac
wp-trac at lists.automattic.com
Thu Dec 31 00:45:03 UTC 2009
#9674: Better support for custom post types
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Reporter: wnorris | Owner: ryan
Type: task (blessed) | Status: reopened
Priority: normal | Milestone: 3.0
Component: Administration | Version: 2.9
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: has-patch tested early |
------------------------------------+---------------------------------------
Comment(by mikeschinkel):
'''@ryan:''' I just found/read @janeforshort's comments which I'll include
here:
''@janeforshort: Per Ryan's comment, some of the thinking behind using
'content types' rather than 'post types' as a label is because the end
user generally thinks of post types in terms of having a different
template for a specific type of post, like a review, recipe, blog post,
aside, etc., and doesn't think about it in CMS terms (products, listings,
etc).''
I see her point for existing Wordpress sites but honestly think once
custom post types because more exposed in Wordpress then that point become
moot.
I'm pretty sure people don't think much about templates vs. posts, they
think about reviews, recipes, blog posts, asides, products, listings, etc.
Once they can go in an create a custom post type called "review",
"recipe", "product" or "listing" rather than have to create a post
template that makes a (blog) post behave like one of them then users will
do that because doing so will provide them more appropriate functionality.
(BTW, I don't see how a review or a recipe is conceptually any different
than a product or a listing. They all have custom attributes that
identify them separately from a generic post.)
What's more there will mostly be a one-to-one correspondence between
custom post types and custom post templates just as there already are
different templates for each of posts, pages and attachments and for my
plugin each custom post type gets its own custom post type template. So
rather than argue for a new term I really think ''@janeforshort's'' point
argues to ''keep'' the term "post type" if, as she says, people think in
terms a "post type" meaning "a different template."; that's exactly the
association we'll want them to have, i.e.
''Using a custom post type equates to using a template for a custom
type of content''
--
Ticket URL: <http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/9674#comment:76>
WordPress Trac <http://core.trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress blogging software
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list