[wp-trac] Re: [WordPress Trac] #3982: post.php inline documentation
WordPress Trac
wp-trac at lists.automattic.com
Sat Mar 31 22:35:47 GMT 2007
#3982: post.php inline documentation
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------
Reporter: m0n5t3r | Owner: anonymous
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone: 2.3
Component: Administration | Version:
Severity: normal | Resolution:
Keywords: has-patch needs-testing 2nd-opinion developer-feedback |
--------------------------------------------------------------------+-------
Changes (by jhodgdon):
* keywords: has-patch needs-testing 2nd-opinion => has-patch needs-
testing 2nd-opinion developer-feedback
Comment:
I think it is a great idea to add documentation to the PHP functions of
WordPress, if it is correct and descriptive.
However, there are two proplems with the proposed patch, in my opinion:
1) Not all the doc is correct (I think). For instance, the first function
I believe returns the attachment's file name, but the doc says "returns
meta data", which is sort of true but not very specific. The second
function doc is similarly misleading.I sort of stopped reading at this
point, so I'm not sure how many other functions are not correctly
documented.
2) Style: the descriptions are too short, and the "return" sections give
the data type but not a description of what the value is. The style is
also inconsistent. I suggest going to java.sun.com and reading their notes
on how to create good API doc.
My recommendation is to reject this patch as-is, and rewrite it to be
better documentation. It is better to have to read the code than to be
mislead by a function header, in my opinion. And if you're going to the
trouble of putting in function header documentation, it should be good
documentation.
--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3982#comment:2>
WordPress Trac <http://trac.wordpress.org/>
WordPress blogging software
More information about the wp-trac
mailing list