[wp-meta] [Making WordPress.org] #5473: Update one line of copy on https://wordpress.org/hosting/

[Making WordPress.org]

#5473: Update one line of copy on https://wordpress.org/hosting/
--------------------------------+---------------------
 Reporter:  chanthaboune        |       Owner:  (none)
     Type:  defect              |      Status:  new
 Priority:  normal              |   Milestone:
Component:  WordPress.org Site  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:  needs-copy-review   |
--------------------------------+---------------------

Comment (by reeseallworth):

 It should be several condenders on the list,  from affordable, scalable,
 small to large projects, and include a method for user reviews like you do
 the plugins.
 The ratings should be based on several factors:
 Best overall

 Price, Traffic, Best for power users, Support,  Speed/Performance, Overall
 Experience,  Comments on experience (just to start)

 My company has thousands of WordPress customers worldwide, our experience
 with Dreamhost and Siteground is horrible, less than a one star rating. We
 had to switch the customers to more reliable hosting companies. Siteground
 is bad because it no longer offers unlimited plans, limited webspace,
 limited visits, hit those limits and it gets expensive.  Dreamhost has a
 slew of DNS, and Server problems as well as the worst rating for support.

 The list does not even include some of the other top companies,  as Host
 Gator, Flywheel, Kinsta, WP Engine, Hostinger, A2 Hosting, InMotion, and
 newer companies like Green Geeks, Site5 and iPage.

 It does not have to be that these are endorsed by Wordpress if that is the
 pressure.

 I think the current list reflects badly on Wordpress

-- 
Ticket URL: <https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/5473#comment:13>
Making WordPress.org <https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/>
Making WordPress.org