[wp-meta] [Making WordPress.org] #1810: Better formatting for FAQ
Making WordPress.org
noreply at wordpress.org
Wed Aug 17 04:34:38 UTC 2016
#1810: Better formatting for FAQ
------------------------------+------------------
Reporter: samuelsidler | Owner:
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: normal | Milestone:
Component: Plugin Directory | Resolution:
Keywords: |
------------------------------+------------------
Comment (by dd32):
The more correct method to do this would be to parse the FAQ prior to
markdown occurring, which you can see in the `upgrade_notice` section
above the proposed change in [attachment:1810.diff], I'm not entirely sure
why screenshots are being parsed afterwards though..
You would then expose it as a `Readme\Parser::$faq[ $question ] =>
$answer` property on the object, `CLI\Parser` would then be responsible
for storing it however you wanted, which could be a `<dl>` in the post
content, or as custom meta fields (as we do with screenshots, etc).
Whichever way you approach it, it's worth remembering that not all FAQ's
are using `<h4>`'s some use `<h3>` (`members`) and others use `<strong>`
(`share-this`) or `<h9>` (, some include free form data before the
headings (for example, `wp-user-avatar`), others (`cookie-notice`) just
include a paragraph, and then there's those who use free-form "invalid"
formats (`wpremote` &`jquery-updater`).
Those plugins were just me opening a bunch of random plugins in the
database and looking at their post_content, I'd say it was a 50% hit rate
on "edge cases" while looking for examples. Ignoring, truncating, or
reformatting plugins like this is fine, we just need to plan that out
before we parse stuff.
--
Ticket URL: <https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/1810#comment:7>
Making WordPress.org <https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/>
Making WordPress.org
More information about the wp-meta
mailing list