That was a stupid question - used delete_user_meta. Thanks again
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 3:23 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
greglancaster71 at gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah i see. The wordpress codex is inexpendable to me right now haha, I dont
> have all this stuff programmed into my brain yet.
>
> So for the unfollow option, I will be using unset right? and there isnt
> any special magic or voodoo I should know about here?
>
> unset($reChkMetaValue[ $profileID ]);
> I have unset arrays before in class, but never a wordpress serialized
> array. Same thing?
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:33 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co> wrote:
>
>> Yes, that is what was happening with the arrays, because each time you
>> pulled the value out of the database, it was being wrapped in an array
>> (because get_user_meta() was pulling the values for all ‘friends’ keys for
>> the user). You added one user ID to it, and then put it back. That was
>> happening each time you followed a user. Now that it is working correctly,
>> the array will be only one layer deep. I remember coming up against this
>> thing with get_user_meta() myself once when I was first learning WP
>> development. :-)
>>
>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 5:28 PM, Gregory Lancaster <greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> > did I really spend a couple hours reading for a solution over the word
>> > true. Thank you JD. Real quick, you said:
>> >
>> > When you call in_array() it is checking if the user ID (say, 3 ) is in
>> the
>> > outer array. But it isn’t, the only thing in it is another array. When
>> you
>> > call get_user_meta() with the third parameter set to true, the returned
>> > value won’t be wrapped in the outer array like that, so it will work.
>> >
>> > Why are arrays stored so many tiers deep like that? Is this a wordpress
>> > only thing, or is this normal? It looks like everytime a persons ID is
>> > added, another instance of array(array(array( is added. What is the
>> > reasoning behind this? Or do I understand it incorrectly?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:22 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co>
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Ah.. We forgot to add true to the gat_user_meta() in
>> >> my_add_friend_action(). Add that and you should be good to go.
>> >>
>> >> On Oct 31, 2013, at 5:18 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> Sure;
>> >>>
>> >>> add_action('wp_ajax_my_add_friend_action', 'my_add_friend_action');
>> >>> add_action('wp_ajax_nopriv_my_add_friend_action',
>> >> 'my_add_friend_action');
>> >>> function my_add_friend_action() {
>> >>> global $wpdb;
>> >>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
>> >>> $userID = $_POST['userID'];
>> >>>
>> >>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
>> >>> if ( ! is_array($chkMetaValue) )
>> >>> $chkMetaValue = array();
>> >>> $chkMetaValue[] = $profileID;
>> >>>
>> >>> // activity_tracker($current_user, 'added_friend', 'prof');
>> >>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
>> >>> $response = array( 'success' => true );
>> >>> wp_send_json_success($response);
>> >>> die();
>> >>> }
>> >>>
>> >>> function follow_status($author_id) {
>> >>> global $wpdb, $current_user;
>> >>> get_currentuserinfo();
>> >>>
>> >>> //authorID is the userID of the profile owner
>> >>>
>> >>> $active_user = $current_user->ID;
>> >>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user, 'friends', true);
>> >>>
>> >>> if (in_array($author_id, $active_user_friends)) {
>> >>> $follow_status = "<button id='remove_friend'>Remove Friend</button>";
>> >>> } else {
>> >>> $follow_status = "<button id='add_friend'>Add Friend</button>";
>> >>> }
>> >>>
>> >>> return $follow_status;
>> >>> }
>> >>>
>> >>> and calling in the profile page with:
>> >>>
>> >>> echo follow_status($author_id);
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:16 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co>
>> >> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> Could you post your code again? Somewhere you are still getting the
>> >> value
>> >>>> wrapped in an extra array.
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 5:08 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
>> >> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>> No I must have screwed something up man, it only shows the last
>> value.
>> >> I
>> >>>>> searched for awhile before responding here, and I see some people
>> say
>> >>>>> in_array adds a line between items and sometimes other folks needed
>> to
>> >>>>> strip those. But I have no idea if thats whats going on here. It
>> all
>> >>>>> looks like it should function. :-/ Maybe I need to get off the
>> >> computer
>> >>>>> for awhile.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I var_dump using the function you shared, and this is what the
>> friend
>> >>>> array
>> >>>>> looks like from there:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> array(2) {\n [0]=>\n array(2) {\n [0]=>\n array(2) {\n
>> >>>> [0]=>\n
>> >>>>> array(2) {\n [0]=>\n array(2) {\n [0]=>\n
>> >>>>> array(1) {\n [0]=>\n string(1) "1"\n
>> >> }\n
>> >>>>> [1]=>\n string(1) "9"\n }\n [1]=>\n
>> >>>>> string(2) "13"\n }\n [1]=>\n string(2) "16"\n }\n
>> >>>>> [1]=>\n string(2) "13"\n }\n [1]=>\n string(1) "3"\n}\n
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> I dont know if that assists in debugging.
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:52 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co>
>> >>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>> OK, you need to just delete that meta row and start over. It is
>> messed
>> >>>> up
>> >>>>>> from before. Do that and see if it works.
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
>> >>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> I have it set to true:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user, 'friends',
>> true);
>> >>>>>>> But the issue is that it only shows the "friended" code for the
>> last
>> >>>>>> user I
>> >>>>>>> added. If I click add on one profile, and then to a second, the
>> >> first
>> >>>> no
>> >>>>>>> longer shows friend added. Even if I have clearly added several to
>> >> the
>> >>>>>>> array:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;s:0:"";i:1;s:2:"16";}i:1;s:2:"12";}i:1;s:2:"13";}i:1;s:2:"12";}i:1;s:1:"3";}i:1;s:2:"13";}
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:40 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co
>> >
>> >>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> No, you don’t need to use unserialize, that is all done
>> >> automatically
>> >>>> by
>> >>>>>>>> the WordPress functions.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> In the code you posted you still aren’t calling get_user_meta()
>> with
>> >>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> third parameter set to true. You need to do that. Right now the
>> >> array
>> >>>>>> it is
>> >>>>>>>> returning looks something like this:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> array(
>> >>>>>>>> 0 => array( 3, 45, 6, 33 )
>> >>>>>>>> )
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> When you call in_array() it is checking if the user ID (say, 3 )
>> is
>> >> in
>> >>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> outer array. But it isn’t, the only thing in it is another array.
>> >> When
>> >>>>>> you
>> >>>>>>>> call get_user_meta() with the third parameter set to true, the
>> >>>> returned
>> >>>>>>>> value won’t be wrapped in the outer array like that, so it will
>> >> work.
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
>> >>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Ah I see. Thank you for explaining JD. It sounds like maybe the
>> >>>> easier
>> >>>>>>>>> option is to just create a separate table to store the friends
>> list
>> >>>> in.
>> >>>>>>>>> Trying to work with user_meta this way seems like a bad idea.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> Quick question, should I be using unserialize to check the array
>> >>>> values
>> >>>>>>>>> using in_array? Because right now this code isnt working.
>> Thats
>> >> the
>> >>>>>>>> only
>> >>>>>>>>> thing that seems to be left out - but when I tried using
>> >> $unserialize
>> >>>>>>>> like
>> >>>>>>>>> this:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> $unserialize = unserialize($active_user_friends);
>> >>>>>>>>> if (in_array($author_id, $unserialize)) {
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> it says this:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> *Warning*: unserialize() expects parameter 1 to be string, array
>> >>>> given
>> >>>>>>>>> and
>> >>>>>>>>> *Warning*: in_array() expects parameter 2 to be array, boolean
>> >> given
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> --------
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> add_action('wp_ajax_my_add_friend_action',
>> 'my_add_friend_action');
>> >>>>>>>>> add_action('wp_ajax_nopriv_my_add_friend_action',
>> >>>>>>>> 'my_add_friend_action');
>> >>>>>>>>> function my_add_friend_action() {
>> >>>>>>>>> global $wpdb;
>> >>>>>>>>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
>> >>>>>>>>> $userID = $_POST['userID'];
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
>> >>>>>>>>> if ( ! is_array($chkMetaValue) )
>> >>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = array();
>> >>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue[] = $profileID;
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> // activity_tracker($current_user, 'added_friend', 'prof');
>> >>>>>>>>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
>> >>>>>>>>> $response = array( 'success' => true );
>> >>>>>>>>> wp_send_json_success($response);
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> die();
>> >>>>>>>>> }
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> function friend_status($author_id) {
>> >>>>>>>>> global $wpdb, $current_user;
>> >>>>>>>>> get_currentuserinfo();
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> //authorID is the userID of the profile owner
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> $active_user = $current_user->ID;
>> >>>>>>>>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user, 'friends');
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> if (in_array($author_id, $active_user_friends, true)) {
>> >>>>>>>>> $friend_status = "<button id='remove_friend'>Remove
>> >> Friend</button>";
>> >>>>>>>>> } else {
>> >>>>>>>>> $friend_status = "<button id='add_friend'>Add Friend</button>";
>> >>>>>>>>> }
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> return $friend_status;
>> >>>>>>>>> }
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> That is basically the code I am using to insert the users id
>> into
>> >>>> their
>> >>>>>>>>> user_meta table.
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:08 PM, J.D. Grimes <
>> jdg at codesymphony.co>
>> >>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> There are two ways to use the *_meta functions. The way it
>> looks
>> >>>> like
>> >>>>>>>> you
>> >>>>>>>>>> are doing it is that each user has a single entry in the
>> usermeta
>> >>>>>> table,
>> >>>>>>>>>> with the key ‘friends’. The value for this meta key will be
>> stored
>> >>>> in
>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>> database as a serialized array, and when it is pulled out (by
>> >>>>>>>>>> get_user_meta()) it gets unserialized into a PHP array.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> Alternative is this: Each user has multiple ‘friend’ meta key
>> rows
>> >>>> in
>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>> usermeta table, each one’s meta_value the ID of a single user
>> that
>> >>>> the
>> >>>>>>>> user
>> >>>>>>>>>> has friended.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> The benefit of the second option is that the values may be
>> easier
>> >> to
>> >>>>>>>>>> search. Much easier. But that may not be important to you right
>> >> now.
>> >>>>>>>> (But
>> >>>>>>>>>> then that could change later…) What if you want to show a list
>> of
>> >>>>>> users
>> >>>>>>>> who
>> >>>>>>>>>> have friended a user? You will be able to do that easily with
>> >> this.
>> >>>>>> With
>> >>>>>>>>>> the first option, it is possible, but more complex and probably
>> >>>> harder
>> >>>>>>>> on
>> >>>>>>>>>> the DB.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> The downside is that there are many more rows in usermeta
>> table.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> So each of these functions let you target a single row (as in
>> >> first
>> >>>>>>>> case)
>> >>>>>>>>>> or all rows with a key (as in the later case). Whichever way
>> you
>> >> go,
>> >>>>>> you
>> >>>>>>>>>> just need to be consistent through all of the code, obviously.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> -J.D.
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
>> >>>>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> What would be the benefit of storing the friends in separate
>> >> rows?
>> >>>> I
>> >>>>>>>> did
>> >>>>>>>>>>> not know that was an option, but don't see any clear
>> advantages
>> >>>>>> either.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> Also, I did just search the codex but dont see anything about
>> >>>> unique
>> >>>>>>>>>> rows.
>> >>>>>>>>>>> (I checked get_user_meta, delete_user_meta, update_user_meta.
>> )
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM, J.D. Grimes <
>> >> jdg at codesymphony.co
>> >>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, when you call get_user_meta() you need to set the third
>> >>>>>> parameter
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> ($single) to true:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta( $active_user,
>> ‘friends’,
>> >>>> true
>> >>>>>> );
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Otherwise it will return a nested array. Also, just FYI,
>> >>>>>> alternatively
>> >>>>>>>>>> you
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> could leave the get_user_meta() call the way it is, and
>> change
>> >> it
>> >>>> so
>> >>>>>>>>>> that
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> each friend is stored in a separate meta row (but with the
>> same
>> >>>> meta
>> >>>>>>>>>> key -
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> have a look at the *_user_meta functions on the codex).
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> -J.D.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
>> >>>>>>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I thought so. One more question if you dont mind helping;
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> This is the function I wrote to determine what button to
>> show
>> >> on
>> >>>>>> page
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> load.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> But regardless if someone has been friended or not, it shows
>> >> the
>> >>>>>> add
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> friend option. Is something wrong with this?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> function friend_status($author_id) {
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> global $wpdb, $current_user;
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> get_currentuserinfo();
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> //authorID is the userID of the profile owner
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $active_user = $current_user->ID;
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user,
>> 'friends');
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> if (in_array($author_id, $active_user_friends)) {
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $friend_status = "<button id='remove_friend'>Remove
>> >>>>>> Friend</button>";
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> } else {
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> $friend_status = "<button id='add_friend'>Add
>> Friend</button>";
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> return $friend_status;
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Then on page: echo $friend_status;
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:53 AM, J.D. Grimes <
>> >>>> jdg at codesymphony.co
>> >>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Yes, I would write a separate function for removal, and
>> hook
>> >> it
>> >>>>>> to a
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> different AJAX action for removal.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> That works easier :) Once someone is friended I have it
>> set
>> >> so
>> >>>>>> an
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> unfriend
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> button replaces the add friend button via ajax. Is it
>> >>>> necessary
>> >>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> write
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> another function for deleting a person? Not sure exactly
>> how
>> >>>> to
>> >>>>>>>> make
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> new button function since the data being sent is not
>> attached
>> >>>> to
>> >>>>>>>> the
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> button
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> in any way. maybe I could add a value to the button that
>> >> says
>> >>>>>>>> remove
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> or
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> add, which would be passed to the function and determine
>> what
>> >>>>>>>> action
>> >>>>>>>>>> to
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> take?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:32 AM, J.D. Grimes <
>> >>>>>> jdg at codesymphony.co
>> >>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I would do this:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if ( ! is_array($chkMetaValue) )
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = array();
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue[] = $profileID; // or use array_push()
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -J.D.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:32 PM, BenderisGreat <
>> >>>>>>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I am not sure exactly how this would work because I
>> start
>> >>>> with
>> >>>>>> an
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> empty
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> meta_value field. I dont think I can use array_push if
>> >> there
>> >>>>>> is
>> >>>>>>>>>> not
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> at
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> least one value in the field, correct?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So maybe something like this:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> if (!empty($chkMetaValue))
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> {
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> array_push($profileID);
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> } else {
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> $profileID;
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> }
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Is that right?
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>
>> http://wordpress-hackers.1065353.n5.nabble.com/array-push-on-update-user-meta-tp42688.html
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Wordpress Hackers mailing list archive at
>> >>>>>>>> Nabble.com.
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>>>
>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>>>
>> >>>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>
>> >>>> _______________________________________________
>> >>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> wp-hackers mailing list
>> >> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> >> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >>
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > wp-hackers mailing list
>> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>
>
>