[wp-hackers] array_push on update_user_meta
Gregory Lancaster
greglancaster71 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 31 21:08:28 UTC 2013
No I must have screwed something up man, it only shows the last value. I
searched for awhile before responding here, and I see some people say
in_array adds a line between items and sometimes other folks needed to
strip those. But I have no idea if thats whats going on here. It all
looks like it should function. :-/ Maybe I need to get off the computer
for awhile.
I var_dump using the function you shared, and this is what the friend array
looks like from there:
array(2) {\n [0]=>\n array(2) {\n [0]=>\n array(2) {\n [0]=>\n
array(2) {\n [0]=>\n array(2) {\n [0]=>\n
array(1) {\n [0]=>\n string(1) "1"\n }\n
[1]=>\n string(1) "9"\n }\n [1]=>\n
string(2) "13"\n }\n [1]=>\n string(2) "16"\n }\n
[1]=>\n string(2) "13"\n }\n [1]=>\n string(1) "3"\n}\n
I dont know if that assists in debugging.
On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:52 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co> wrote:
> OK, you need to just delete that meta row and start over. It is messed up
> from before. Do that and see if it works.
>
> On Oct 31, 2013, at 4:49 PM, Gregory Lancaster <greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I have it set to true:
> >
> > $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user, 'friends', true);
> > But the issue is that it only shows the "friended" code for the last
> user I
> > added. If I click add on one profile, and then to a second, the first no
> > longer shows friend added. Even if I have clearly added several to the
> > array:
> >
> >
> a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;a:2:{i:0;s:0:"";i:1;s:2:"16";}i:1;s:2:"12";}i:1;s:2:"13";}i:1;s:2:"12";}i:1;s:1:"3";}i:1;s:2:"13";}
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:40 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co>
> wrote:
> >
> >> No, you don’t need to use unserialize, that is all done automatically by
> >> the WordPress functions.
> >>
> >> In the code you posted you still aren’t calling get_user_meta() with the
> >> third parameter set to true. You need to do that. Right now the array
> it is
> >> returning looks something like this:
> >>
> >> array(
> >> 0 => array( 3, 45, 6, 33 )
> >> )
> >>
> >> When you call in_array() it is checking if the user ID (say, 3 ) is in
> the
> >> outer array. But it isn’t, the only thing in it is another array. When
> you
> >> call get_user_meta() with the third parameter set to true, the returned
> >> value won’t be wrapped in the outer array like that, so it will work.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Oct 31, 2013, at 4:30 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Ah I see. Thank you for explaining JD. It sounds like maybe the easier
> >>> option is to just create a separate table to store the friends list in.
> >>> Trying to work with user_meta this way seems like a bad idea.
> >>>
> >>> Quick question, should I be using unserialize to check the array values
> >>> using in_array? Because right now this code isnt working. Thats the
> >> only
> >>> thing that seems to be left out - but when I tried using $unserialize
> >> like
> >>> this:
> >>>
> >>> $unserialize = unserialize($active_user_friends);
> >>> if (in_array($author_id, $unserialize)) {
> >>>
> >>> it says this:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> *Warning*: unserialize() expects parameter 1 to be string, array given
> >>> and
> >>> *Warning*: in_array() expects parameter 2 to be array, boolean given
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> add_action('wp_ajax_my_add_friend_action', 'my_add_friend_action');
> >>> add_action('wp_ajax_nopriv_my_add_friend_action',
> >> 'my_add_friend_action');
> >>> function my_add_friend_action() {
> >>> global $wpdb;
> >>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
> >>> $userID = $_POST['userID'];
> >>>
> >>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
> >>> if ( ! is_array($chkMetaValue) )
> >>> $chkMetaValue = array();
> >>> $chkMetaValue[] = $profileID;
> >>>
> >>> // activity_tracker($current_user, 'added_friend', 'prof');
> >>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
> >>> $response = array( 'success' => true );
> >>> wp_send_json_success($response);
> >>>
> >>> die();
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> function friend_status($author_id) {
> >>> global $wpdb, $current_user;
> >>> get_currentuserinfo();
> >>>
> >>> //authorID is the userID of the profile owner
> >>>
> >>> $active_user = $current_user->ID;
> >>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user, 'friends');
> >>>
> >>> if (in_array($author_id, $active_user_friends, true)) {
> >>> $friend_status = "<button id='remove_friend'>Remove Friend</button>";
> >>> } else {
> >>> $friend_status = "<button id='add_friend'>Add Friend</button>";
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>> return $friend_status;
> >>> }
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> That is basically the code I am using to insert the users id into their
> >>> user_meta table.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 1:08 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> There are two ways to use the *_meta functions. The way it looks like
> >> you
> >>>> are doing it is that each user has a single entry in the usermeta
> table,
> >>>> with the key ‘friends’. The value for this meta key will be stored in
> >> the
> >>>> database as a serialized array, and when it is pulled out (by
> >>>> get_user_meta()) it gets unserialized into a PHP array.
> >>>>
> >>>> Alternative is this: Each user has multiple ‘friend’ meta key rows in
> >> the
> >>>> usermeta table, each one’s meta_value the ID of a single user that the
> >> user
> >>>> has friended.
> >>>>
> >>>> The benefit of the second option is that the values may be easier to
> >>>> search. Much easier. But that may not be important to you right now.
> >> (But
> >>>> then that could change later…) What if you want to show a list of
> users
> >> who
> >>>> have friended a user? You will be able to do that easily with this.
> With
> >>>> the first option, it is possible, but more complex and probably harder
> >> on
> >>>> the DB.
> >>>>
> >>>> The downside is that there are many more rows in usermeta table.
> >>>>
> >>>> So each of these functions let you target a single row (as in first
> >> case)
> >>>> or all rows with a key (as in the later case). Whichever way you go,
> you
> >>>> just need to be consistent through all of the code, obviously.
> >>>>
> >>>> -J.D.
> >>>>
> >>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 3:30 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> >> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> What would be the benefit of storing the friends in separate rows? I
> >> did
> >>>>> not know that was an option, but don't see any clear advantages
> either.
> >>>>> Also, I did just search the codex but dont see anything about unique
> >>>> rows.
> >>>>> (I checked get_user_meta, delete_user_meta, update_user_meta. )
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 12:24 PM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Yes, when you call get_user_meta() you need to set the third
> parameter
> >>>>>> ($single) to true:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta( $active_user, ‘friends’, true
> );
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Otherwise it will return a nested array. Also, just FYI,
> alternatively
> >>>> you
> >>>>>> could leave the get_user_meta() call the way it is, and change it so
> >>>> that
> >>>>>> each friend is stored in a separate meta row (but with the same meta
> >>>> key -
> >>>>>> have a look at the *_user_meta functions on the codex).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> -J.D.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 3:14 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> >>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I thought so. One more question if you dont mind helping;
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> This is the function I wrote to determine what button to show on
> page
> >>>>>> load.
> >>>>>>> But regardless if someone has been friended or not, it shows the
> add
> >>>>>>> friend option. Is something wrong with this?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> function friend_status($author_id) {
> >>>>>>> global $wpdb, $current_user;
> >>>>>>> get_currentuserinfo();
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> //authorID is the userID of the profile owner
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> $active_user = $current_user->ID;
> >>>>>>> $active_user_friends = get_user_meta($active_user, 'friends');
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> if (in_array($author_id, $active_user_friends)) {
> >>>>>>> $friend_status = "<button id='remove_friend'>Remove
> Friend</button>";
> >>>>>>> } else {
> >>>>>>> $friend_status = "<button id='add_friend'>Add Friend</button>";
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> return $friend_status;
> >>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Then on page: echo $friend_status;
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:53 AM, J.D. Grimes <jdg at codesymphony.co
> >
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yes, I would write a separate function for removal, and hook it
> to a
> >>>>>>>> different AJAX action for removal.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 2:48 PM, Gregory Lancaster <
> >>>>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> That works easier :) Once someone is friended I have it set so
> an
> >>>>>>>> unfriend
> >>>>>>>>> button replaces the add friend button via ajax. Is it necessary
> to
> >>>>>> write
> >>>>>>>>> another function for deleting a person? Not sure exactly how to
> >> make
> >>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>> new button function since the data being sent is not attached to
> >> the
> >>>>>>>> button
> >>>>>>>>> in any way. maybe I could add a value to the button that says
> >> remove
> >>>>>> or
> >>>>>>>>> add, which would be passed to the function and determine what
> >> action
> >>>> to
> >>>>>>>>> take?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 11:32 AM, J.D. Grimes <
> jdg at codesymphony.co
> >>>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> I would do this:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> if ( ! is_array($chkMetaValue) )
> >>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = array();
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue[] = $profileID; // or use array_push()
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> -J.D.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Oct 31, 2013, at 1:32 PM, BenderisGreat <
> >>>> greglancaster71 at gmail.com
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> I am not sure exactly how this would work because I start with
> an
> >>>>>> empty
> >>>>>>>>>>> meta_value field. I dont think I can use array_push if there
> is
> >>>> not
> >>>>>> at
> >>>>>>>>>>> least one value in the field, correct?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> So maybe something like this:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> $profileID = $_POST['profileID'];
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> $chkMetaValue = get_user_meta($userID,"friends");
> >>>>>>>>>>> if (!empty($chkMetaValue))
> >>>>>>>>>>> {
> >>>>>>>>>>> array_push($profileID);
> >>>>>>>>>>> } else {
> >>>>>>>>>>> $profileID;
> >>>>>>>>>>> }
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> update_user_meta( $userID, 'friends', $chkMetaValue );
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Is that right?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> View this message in context:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> http://wordpress-hackers.1065353.n5.nabble.com/array-push-on-update-user-meta-tp42688.html
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sent from the Wordpress Hackers mailing list archive at
> >> Nabble.com.
> >>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> wp-hackers mailing list
> >>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> wp-hackers mailing list
> >> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> >> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-hackers mailing list
> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>
More information about the wp-hackers
mailing list