[wp-hackers] Code reviews for plugins?
Paul
paul at codehooligans.com
Thu Aug 19 20:32:07 UTC 2010
+1 on this.
P-
On Aug 19, 2010, at 4:08 PM, Daniel Bachhuber wrote:
> I think it's a great idea as well. My coding has benefited tremendously from the generosity of others, and I'd love to start being able to give back.
>
> On 19 Aug 2010, at 4:01 PM, Eric Mann wrote:
>
>> I, for one, would love to participate in a peer review process.
>>
>> I recommended last year that someone* put together a group of developers to
>> review plug-ins. I was hoping we could flag "reviewed" plug-ins in the
>> repository to give them a bit of extra work - like verifying that a new version
>> really does worth with the version of WordPress it claims to. If we *could*
>> flag such plug-ins, it would give the quality ones more weight and allow for a
>> quick filter or search.
>>
>> In any case, +1 on the idea. And seriously, keep us apprised regarding any kind
>> of wpcodereview.com collaboration.
>>
>> On August 19, 2010 at 7:44 PM Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel at newclarity.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Matt:
>>>
>>> I had the same idea recently and registered http://wpcodereview.com for that
>>> purpose. Want to collaborate?
>>>
>>> Another option might be to see if we could somehow use the voting mechanism
>>> that works so well to surface reviews of plugins on WordPress Answers[1]?
>>>
>>> Whatever the case, +1 on the concern and the desire to do something about it.
>>>
>>> -Mike
>>> [1] http://wordpress.stackexchange.com/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Aug 19, 2010, at 3:39 PM, Matt Jacob wrote:
>>>
>>>> Fact: the quality of plugins in the repository is generally pretty low.
>>>>
>>>> Obviously, there are exceptions, and those exceptions rise to the top and
>>>> become more popular. But for the 10,000-some plugins listed, I bet that
>>>> fewer than 100 of those would be considered best practices in plugin
>>>> development. Unfortunately, most---not all---plugin developers probably
>>>> don't even give a crap.
>>>>
>>>> For those developers who *do* give a crap (or several craps), and who *do*
>>>> want to publish high-quality plugins, what resources are available? I was
>>>> thinking it might be neat if more experienced WP developers from wp-hackers
>>>> volunteered to do code reviews of up-and-coming plugins (initiated by the
>>>> plugin developer; not just a random selection).
>>>>
>>>> You could be the best software engineer in the world, but WordPress is a
>>>> separate beast. It's a huge system that's evolved over many years, and the
>>>> fact of the matter is that the more experience developers need to pass on
>>>> the tribal knowledge they've acquired along the way. IMO, code reviews are a
>>>> good way to do that.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> Matt
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>
> --
> Daniel Bachhuber
> www.danielbachhuber.com
> danielbachhuber at gmail.com
> cell: +1 971 998 5407
> aim/skype/twitter: danielbachhuber
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
More information about the wp-hackers
mailing list