[wp-hackers] wp_enqueue_script() and URLs with 2+ parameters

[Glenn Ansley]

>> So I'm not sure I understand what the problem with having the & replaced with & is.

I think this is a fairly limited use and may not be necessary for
core. The reason its necessary here is because the JS script being
called is a .php script and he's going to want to use $_GET to do
something with the query string vars... I'm guessing that's why he
needs the & intact. That's why I did.

Glenn Ansley
WordPress Pluign Development
http://fullthrottledevelopment.com


On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 3:01 PM, Matt Martz <mdmartz at sivel.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:50 PM, Glenn Ansley <glenn at glennansley.com> wrote:
>>>wp_enqueue_script('my-custom-js',"$template_url/ js/ my-custom-js .js.php?p1=A&p2=B&p3=C",array('jquery'),'1.0');
>>
>> Oh yeah... depending on where these query vars are coming from, it
>> might be wise to add some form of cleaning back to them in your filter
>> since you're now bypassing clean_url()
>>
>> Glenn Ansley
>> WordPress Pluign Development
>> http://fullthrottledevelopment.com
>>
>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 2:44 PM, Austin Matzko <if.website at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 27, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Glenn Ansley <glenn at glennansley.com> wrote:
>>>>>To fix this in current WordPress, filter 'script_loader_src'
>>>> I believe this is too early. Whatever you output from
>>>> script_loader_src will still be cleaned by clean_url(). Correct? (i'm
>>>> not testing as i respond)
>>>
>>> You are correct.  My mistake.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>
>
> So I'm not sure I understand what the problem with having the &
> replaced with &#038; is.
>
> The reason it is done is because & signs on their own do not validate
> as XHTML.  I don't see any reason why having &#038; wouldn't work.
> Generally & signs are replaced with &amp; but &#038; is the same
> thing.
>
> --
> Matt Martz
> matt at sivel.net
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>