[wp-hackers] SWFobject not included in core?

[scribu]

Seriously, how many concurent plugins that rely on SWFObject can you have
installed on one WP install?

On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:35 AM, Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel at newclarity.net
> wrote:

> Yes, it can be bundled but it's a shame to have so many copies of the same
> library lying around for a commonly used library (i.e. man with 2 watches
> never really knows what time it is.)
>
> JMTCW
>
> -Mike Schinkel
> http://mikeschinkel.com/
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "scribu" <scribu at gmail.com>
> To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> Sent: Tuesday, February 10, 2009 5:20:46 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
> Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] SWFobject not included in core?
>
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2009 at 10:54 PM, Mike Schinkel <
> mikeschinkel at newclarity.net
> > wrote:
>
> > >  "only libraries that are used in core are distributed as part of the
> > core package"
> >
> > Fair enough.
> >
> > OTOH, IMO its' an unfortunate constraint for those things that could be
> > used by a lot of plugins.
> >
>
> If a certain plugin requires it, the plugin author can bundle the lib with
> the plugin and call it using wp_enqueue_script() so that there are no
> conflicts.
>
> --
> http://scribu.net
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>



-- 
http://scribu.net