[wp-hackers] Re: Removal Of Over 200 Themes?
Navjot Singh
navjotjsingh at gmail.com
Fri Dec 12 20:44:40 GMT 2008
I don't understand this policy of removing theme of a author who only shows
ads of a premium theme. How does GPL violates in this case. Please refer to
http://www.jeffro2pt0.com/why-were-200-wordpress-themes-removed#comment-2952-
Adii's comment here on what I mean. A person whos releases a GPL theme
but
only uses a affiliate banner of a premium theme site - Does this also
violates GPL in a way?
Navjot Singh
On Sat, Dec 13, 2008 at 1:53 AM, Jess Planck <jess at funroe.net> wrote:
> Heh.. Tell that to Cisco:
>
> "In addition, it is asking the court to make Cisco turn over any profits
> from the products covered by the software dispute. "
>
>
> http://www.internetnews.com/storage/article.php/3790721/Cisco+Hit+With+Open+Source+Lawsuit.htm
>
> On Dec 12, 2008, at 2:15 PM, Jeremy Clarke wrote:
>
> Another interesting thing to note is that FSF as a whole practices a
>> very polite form of litigation when it comes to these things. They
>> never ask for damages, just compliance
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>
More information about the wp-hackers
mailing list