[wp-hackers] XCache Variable Storage vs. WP Object Cache

[DD32]

It doesnt appear to be required, But i'd suggest it would be best to include it in your file.
from wp-settings.php:

if ( file_exists(ABSPATH . 'wp-content/object-cache.php') )
	require_once (ABSPATH . 'wp-content/object-cache.php');
else
	require_once (ABSPATH . WPINC . '/cache.php');



On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 22:11:12 +1000, Computer Guru <computerguru at neosmart.net> wrote:

> Is this supposed to be on in the wp-config.php
>
> define(ENABLE_CACHE, true);
>
> when using a custom object-cache.php?
>
>
> On 9/16/07, Computer Guru <computerguru at neosmart.net> wrote:
>>
>> OK, this is what I'm doing currently looks like:
>>
>> set_data:
>> check if is_object() or is_callable()
>> if true, serialize.
>> check if is_resource      (resource is the only thing that is not safe
>> to serialize... )
>> if true, don't cache
>> else store it as-is
>>
>> get_data:
>> check if data is_serialized_object()         (custom function)
>> if true, unserialize and return
>> else just return
>>
>>
>> While I don't get a PHP access violation right away like I used to
>> (before anything even loads), I still get an access violation mid-way
>> through the page load.
>>
>>
>> Anything else I can/should try?
>>
>> On 9/16/07, DD32 <wordpress at dd32.id.au> wrote:
>> > On Sun, 16 Sep 2007 19:31:09 +1000, Computer Guru <
>> computerguru at neosmart.net> wrote:
>> > > Only thing I can think of is this warning on the XCache site:
>> > > Warning : At the moment, It is not possible to store resources,
>> > > callbacks or objects using xcache_* functions.
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > Does WP Object Cache attempt to cache any of these? If so, is there
>> > > any way of stopping it from doing so?
>> >
>> > Theres quite a few Objects being stored in the Object Cache :)
>> > I dont think any Resources are attempted for caching, and i'd be unsure
>> about callbacks.
>> >
>> > using serialize() should convert everything into a string for storing
>> though.
>> >
>> > > Thanks.
>> > >
>> > > On 9/16/07, Stephane Daury <wordpress at tekartist.org> wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> /me loooove memcache
>> > >>
>> > >> But I wish php/memcache would allow for:
>> > >> - regex for keymapping
>> > >> - tag keys like done in the Zend Framework
>> > >>
>> > >> Stephane
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On Sep 16, 2007, at 3:32, Tom Barta wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >> >> But it is almost always going to be faster to use a memory-based
>> > >> >> object storage engine than the built-in file-based method, as
>> > >> >> retrieving data from memory is orders of magnitude faster than
>> > >> >> retrieving data from a hard disk.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > I don't have any hard numbers at the moment, but I was playing with
>> > >> > memcache at one point and discovered something surprising (and
>> > >> > disheartening about PHP);  Caching arbitrary objects with memcache
>> > >> > (within a single request) was faster than using a PHP associative
>> > >> > array as a cache!  Memcache is wicked fast.
>> > >> >
>> > >> > --
>> > >> > Tom
>> > >> > _______________________________________________
>> > >> > wp-hackers mailing list
>> > >> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> > >> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> > >>
>> > >> _______________________________________________
>> > >> wp-hackers mailing list
>> > >> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> > >> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> > >>
>> > >
>> > >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > wp-hackers mailing list
>> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >
>>
>>
>> --
>> Computer Guru
>> Director,
>> NeoSmart Technologies
>> http://neosmart.net/blog/
>>
>
>
>