[wp-hackers] PostgreSQL port status?

[Computer Guru]

Yeah, I know..

I think he's referring to the fact that there is no real reason to use these MySQL-specific ` when a quotation mark will suffice :)

Computer Guru
NeoSmart Technologies
http://neosmart.net/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com [mailto:wp-hackers-
> bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of Robin Adrianse
> Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 12:41 AM
> To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] PostgreSQL port status?
> 
> They're quotation marks symbolizing MySQL fields/tables/databases,
> versus
> straight quotes (') which symbolize strings.
> 
> On 10/1/07, Computer Guru <computerguru at neosmart.net> wrote:
> >
> > I'm sure it's just a bad mysql habit and doesn't mean anything ;-)
> >
> > Computer Guru
> > NeoSmart Technologies
> > http://neosmart.net/
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com [mailto:wp-hackers-
> > > bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of usleepless at gmail.com
> > > Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 4:04 PM
> > > To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > > Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] PostgreSQL port status?
> > >
> > > On 10/1/07, DD32 <wordpress at dd32.id.au> wrote:
> > > > On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:22:48 +1000, Jacob
> <wordpress at santosj.name>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > My thoughts was having all of the queries as filters specific
> to
> > > the
> > > > > function and query. You would end up with about several hundred
> > > filters,
> > > > > but it would allow for the easiest transition. It wouldn't be
> as
> > > hard or
> > > > > difficult as porting and can be just a plugin. It would also
> allow
> > > for
> > > > > removing upgrading conflicts.
> > > >
> > > > That'd be rather pointless IMO, If your wanting to replace the
> > > database,
> > > > then you use your own db class file anyway, All queries will be
> > > passed
> > > > directly to the class, Your code would handle the query before
> its
> > > made.
> > > >
> > > > It would probably be easier if all of WP used the prepare()
> > > functionality
> > > > that 2.3 has introduced, AFAIK that means it'll be using
> something
> > > like
> > > > "SELECT `id` FROM `table` WHERE `name` = '%s' ORDER BY %s" with
> > > parameters
> > > > passed in, It would make it a lot easier for the database class
> to
> > > replace
> > > > 'dodgy' queries with something more friendly for that database.
> > >
> > > `dodgy` is presume?
> > >
> > > why are there `'s in that query?
> > >
> > > what are they good for?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > usleep
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > wp-hackers mailing list
> > > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-hackers mailing list
> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers