[wp-hackers] PostgreSQL port status?

[Computer Guru]

I'm sure it's just a bad mysql habit and doesn't mean anything ;-)

Computer Guru
NeoSmart Technologies
http://neosmart.net/


> -----Original Message-----
> From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com [mailto:wp-hackers-
> bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of usleepless at gmail.com
> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 4:04 PM
> To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] PostgreSQL port status?
> 
> On 10/1/07, DD32 <wordpress at dd32.id.au> wrote:
> > On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:22:48 +1000, Jacob <wordpress at santosj.name>
> wrote:
> > > My thoughts was having all of the queries as filters specific to
> the
> > > function and query. You would end up with about several hundred
> filters,
> > > but it would allow for the easiest transition. It wouldn't be as
> hard or
> > > difficult as porting and can be just a plugin. It would also allow
> for
> > > removing upgrading conflicts.
> >
> > That'd be rather pointless IMO, If your wanting to replace the
> database,
> > then you use your own db class file anyway, All queries will be
> passed
> > directly to the class, Your code would handle the query before its
> made.
> >
> > It would probably be easier if all of WP used the prepare()
> functionality
> > that 2.3 has introduced, AFAIK that means it'll be using something
> like
> > "SELECT `id` FROM `table` WHERE `name` = '%s' ORDER BY %s" with
> parameters
> > passed in, It would make it a lot easier for the database class to
> replace
> > 'dodgy' queries with something more friendly for that database.
> 
> `dodgy` is presume?
> 
> why are there `'s in that query?
> 
> what are they good for?
> 
> regards,
> 
> usleep
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers