[wp-hackers] PostgreSQL port status?

[Jacob]

Is this function in the class? I'm not sure from the missing other 140 
lines before it. If I had the other 140 lines or answer my first question.

Jacob Santos

Computer Guru wrote:
> I'm trying to do just that right now, but I'm getting the weirdest PHP error I've ever seen :S
>
>
> 	function wp_select_db($dbname, $connection_id)
> 	{
> 		global $server;
> 		$conn =  @pg_connect("host={$server->host} user={$server->user} password={$server->pass} dbname=$dbname"); 
> 		$server->user = '';
> 		$server->pass = '';
> 		$server->host = '';
> 		return $conn;
> 	}
>
> 	// ==================================================================
> 	//	Select a DB (if another one needs to be selected)
>
> 	function select($db, &$dbh) {
> 		if ( !wp_select_db($dbh, $db) ) {
> 		$this->bail("error message");
> 		}
> 	}
>
>
> It *INSISTS* that wp_select_db does not exist....
> Fatal error: Call to undefined function wp_select_db() in c:\Inetpub\wwwroot\blog\wp-content\db.php on line 140
>
> I've tried renaming the function and moving the definition, but it is adamantly refusing to see the function I defined /just/ above it.. 
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Computer Guru
> NeoSmart Technologies
> http://neosmart.net/
>
>
>   
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com [mailto:wp-hackers-
>> bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of Jacob
>> Sent: Monday, October 01, 2007 5:02 AM
>> To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] PostgreSQL port status?
>>
>> Ah, not bad, if you replace the global $wpdb with your class and
>> provide
>> the same methods and properties, that would work.
>>
>> However, my previous post is an possible implementation that wouldn't
>> require this step.
>>
>> Jacob Santos
>>
>> DD32 wrote:
>>     
>>> On Mon, 01 Oct 2007 11:22:48 +1000, Jacob <wordpress at santosj.name>
>>>       
>> wrote:
>>     
>>>> My thoughts was having all of the queries as filters specific to the
>>>> function and query. You would end up with about several hundred
>>>>         
>> filters,
>>     
>>>> but it would allow for the easiest transition. It wouldn't be as
>>>>         
>> hard or
>>     
>>>> difficult as porting and can be just a plugin. It would also allow
>>>>         
>> for
>>     
>>>> removing upgrading conflicts.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> That'd be rather pointless IMO, If your wanting to replace the
>>>       
>> database, then you use your own db class file anyway, All queries will
>> be passed directly to the class, Your code would handle the query
>> before its made.
>>     
>>> It would probably be easier if all of WP used the prepare()
>>>       
>> functionality that 2.3 has introduced, AFAIK that means it'll be using
>> something like "SELECT `id` FROM `table` WHERE `name` = '%s' ORDER BY
>> %s" with parameters passed in, It would make it a lot easier for the
>> database class to replace 'dodgy' queries with something more friendly
>> for that database.
>>     
>>> D
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> wp-hackers mailing list
>>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>>
>>>       
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>