[wp-hackers] WP-Cache vs. eAccelerator vs. Memcache vs. ... (Yeah, another server opt. discussion)

[Computer Guru]

I can't duplicate this on any of my servers, though it would help if the
post was a bit more specific as to just WTH happened...

AFAIK the include and require statements in the Super Cache code are all
pretty clean, no problems there. And the blog post mentions exploits of the
"i" and "s" parameters - I have no idea what that's actually supposed to
mean, but assuming that's GET variables then that would be a PHP
vulnerability present in the original WP code, and not the Super Cache
plugin....

Just my two cents.. No need for unwarranted panic, esp. not from some half
thought-out twitter posts.

-CG

-----Original Message-----
From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com
[mailto:wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of Charles
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 2:43 AM
To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
Subject: RE: [wp-hackers] WP-Cache vs. eAccelerator vs. Memcache vs. ...
(Yeah, another server opt. discussion)

Just a heads-up:
http://www.wait-till-i.com/2007/11/08/wp-super-cache-cached-too-far-for-me-a
nd-others/

-- Charles

-----Original Message-----
From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com
[mailto:wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of Doug Stewart
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2007 3:18 AM
To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] WP-Cache vs. eAccelerator vs. Memcache vs. ...
(Yeah, another server opt. discussion)

Everyone on this discussion has seen Donncha's new spin on WP-Cache, right?
http://ocaoimh.ie/2007/11/05/wordpress-super-cache-01/


_______________________________________________
wp-hackers mailing list
wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers