[wp-hackers] 2.2 release

[Marcos Sader | marcosmedia]

Now you have to, it's unstable, so no complains ;)

On 4/19/07, Computer Guru <computerguru at neosmart.net> wrote:
>
> "this was going to happen sooner or later"
>
> I don't think that's true. The hard-core WP testers run everything off
> trunk, and I've personally been doing that on my production site @
> http://neosmart.net/blog/ since the 1.6-to-be days and I never had to
> worry about a thing.
>
> Computer Guru
> NeoSmart Technologies
> http://neosmart.net/blog/
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com [mailto:wp-hackers-
> > bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of Marcos Sader | marcosmedia
> > Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2007 10:57 AM
> > To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] 2.2 release
> >
> > Great, i think this was the right decision to make. Shipping a
> > "temporary-let-us-see-how-it-goes-schema" was not going to make any
> > good to
> > WordPress. Afterall, delaying the release few days is a reasonable
> > price for
> > a stable release ;)
> >
> > Regarding the ones that are using the trunk on their websites... stop
> > whining! :P You knew this was going to happen sooner or later, so find
> > your
> > way around. As someone said above, it is just a list.
> >
> > Now, let's play with the new schema :D
> >
> > On 4/19/07, Mark Jaquith <mark.wordpress at txfx.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Apr 18, 2007, at 1:59 PM, Matt Mullenweg wrote:
> > >
> > > > Let's create a 2.2 branch and start removing the current tagging
> > > > implementation. I'll announce on my blog that 2.2 will be delayed.
> > > >
> > > > Based on how long it takes to extract and test a tag-free 2.2 we'll
> > > > aim for either the 30th or May 7th best case, depending on how many
> > > > people help out with the process. Ryan will also look at bringing
> > > > back widgets as an easy, tested, and already-popular feature that
> > > > will sex up the release.
> > > >
> > > > I think trunk should start experimenting with the new taxonomy
> > > > proposal on the list, which has the potential to do some really
> > > > neat things, but I think it's also going to introduce a lot of
> > > > complexity and need testing beyond the window for 2.2. Pushing it
> > > > to 2.3 will allow it more breathing room and for us not to rush a
> > > > pretty critical building block of WP going forward.
> > >
> > > I think this is the right decision.  My wedding preparations may get
> > > in the way of me helping out towards the end of the 2.2 cycle, but
> > > I'll be back in the saddle to get our new taxonomy system up at the
> > > start of the 2.3 cycle.
> > >
> > > --
> > > Mark Jaquith
> > > http://markjaquith.com/
> > >
> > > Covered Web Services
> > > http://coveredwebservices.com/
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > wp-hackers mailing list
> > > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Marcos Sader
> > m at marcosmedia.com
> > _______________________________________________
> > wp-hackers mailing list
> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>



-- 
Marcos Sader
m at marcosmedia.com