[wp-hackers] i18n URLs
Peter Westwood
peter.westwood at ftwr.co.uk
Mon Oct 30 21:32:26 GMT 2006
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ryan Boren wrote:
> Should we remove the octet-encoding when sanitizing slugs? We'd still
> need to support old, encoded slugs, but new slugs can forego the
> %cf%de%... stuff. Do all of the major browsers support unencoded UTF-8
> characters? Thoughts? Code?
>
What about proxy servers and the like?
I thought true URI's in the RFC sense could only be 7bit
I think most modern browsers support displaying the encoded strings as
UTF8 rather than %encoded but over the wire they still send the %encoded
string.
Checking this with FF gives that impression.
westi
- --
Peter Westwood
http://blog.ftwr.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFFRm9qVPRdzag0AcURAh1WAKCOSVtTViyA/qQges91FHm17elHzQCgjzss
RSVpmUvfMGL3ODgmixCHYVI=
=TABX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the wp-hackers
mailing list