[wp-hackers] i18n URLs

Peter Westwood peter.westwood at ftwr.co.uk
Mon Oct 30 21:32:26 GMT 2006


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ryan Boren wrote:
> Should we remove the octet-encoding when sanitizing slugs?  We'd still
> need to support old, encoded slugs, but new slugs can forego the
> %cf%de%... stuff.  Do all of the major browsers support unencoded UTF-8
> characters? Thoughts?  Code?
> 

What about proxy servers and the like?

I thought true URI's in the RFC sense could only be 7bit

I think most modern browsers support displaying the encoded strings as
UTF8 rather than %encoded but over the wire they still send the %encoded
string.

Checking this with FF gives that impression.

westi
- --
Peter Westwood
http://blog.ftwr.co.uk
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFFRm9qVPRdzag0AcURAh1WAKCOSVtTViyA/qQges91FHm17elHzQCgjzss
RSVpmUvfMGL3ODgmixCHYVI=
=TABX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the wp-hackers mailing list