[wp-hackers] Expected WPMU Performance

[Shayne Sweeney]

In my tests, the memcache object-cache was slower than the same APC based
object-cache, not by much, but it was.

On 10/2/06, Ryan Boren <ryan at boren.nu> wrote:
>
> Shayne Sweeney wrote:
> > Robin,
> >
> > Litespeed is actually what Wordpress.com uses. According to their
> > benchmarks, Litespeed's, Litespeed is faster. My tests have also shown
> > numbers accurate to theirs. I've also tried Lighttpd in the past, both
> > Litespeed and Lighttpd are showing numbers much faster than Apache.
> >
> > I am using a PHP caching as well, in fact, APC (Alternative PHP Cache).
> In
> > the past I have used eAccelerator too. Both provide op-code caching and
> APC
> > also has key based caching, similar to that of memcache.
> >
> > I'm currently writing a caching plugin that acts similar to WP-Cache but
> is
> > computable with WPMU.
> >
> > Still looking for some solution.
>
> You can try out the memcached backend to the WP object cache.
>
> http://dev.wp-plugins.org/browser/memcached/trunk/
>
> Ryan
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>
>