[wp-hackers] Questions on execute-pings.php...

[Angsuman Chakraborty]

> using a socket effectively spawns it off on another thread, another context, 

Has this assumption been verified for php?

This isn't true for languages like C / Java. I haven't tested it for php but it seems that would be rather strange behavior.

-----Original Message-----
From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com
[mailto:wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com]On Behalf Of David Chait
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 1:43 AM
To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] Questions on execute-pings.php...
Importance: Low


Someone correct me if I'm wrong... the 'include' would work within the 
current thread, thus affecting the user response if something takes a while. 
using a socket effectively spawns it off on another thread, another context, 
without affecting the current session.

At least, that's what I seem to recall... ;)

-d

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Angsuman Chakraborty" <angsuman at taragana.com>
To: <wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com>
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:36 PM
Subject: [wp-hackers] Questions on execute-pings.php...


Hi,

I don't understand why the query in the while loop which check for _pingme 
rows doesn't check if the post is really ready to be pingbacked or 
trackbacked (at least post_date < current time).

Also I am trying to understand the real reason behind calling this code via 
a socket connection (instead of including it). is it merely in the hope that 
due to the small timeout sometimes it will fail thereby achieving the 
asynchronicity on pinback and trackback?

Can anyone please clarify.

Best,
Angsuman
http://blog.taragana.com/

_______________________________________________
wp-hackers mailing list
wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers

_______________________________________________
wp-hackers mailing list
wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers