[wp-hackers] Exploit again!

[Mike Little]

On 17/08/05, Michael D Adams <mikea at turbonet.com> wrote:
> I don't know when/how things happened, but I don't think Esser's
> point can be quite so easily dismissed.  What he brings up is not
> uncompelling (... that can't be a word).
> 
> By the timestamps:
> Dev blog post: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 23:17:29 +0000
> Rev 2783: Mon, 15 Aug 2005 03:57:54 GMT
> 
> If the people that know say it's not an issue, that's ok by me.  But
> that view should be explained more clearly than "this happened before
> that", when it looks like the opposite is true.  (I say "looks like"
> because I suppose there could be some bad time settings out there.)
> 
> Michael
> --mdawaffe
> 

Yep, it seems Matt's 

> it was fixed as soon as he reported it which was after my 
> initial build but before anyone had really downloaded it

needs to be taken with a pinch of salt. Over four hours worth of
potential downloads of the wrong version!


Mike
-- 
Mike Little
http://zed1.com/journalized/