[theme-reviewers] Need Help

[Steve Kamn]

Thanks Admins.

On 18-Sep-2014, at 12:02 am, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:

> ​Adding up... (somewhat related)
> 
> If there is no respond from the author in let's say 7+ days, you can close the ticket as not-approved and note about the inactivity. 
> Now if the reviewer does not respond within the same period of time, we will reassign to the first available reviewer.​
> 
> Also, assigned ticket should be completed at your earliest convenience, I've seen folks assign, go on vacation and leave the author hanging. :)
> 
> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 1:52 PM, Steve Kamn <stevekamn at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks @Edward and @Srikanth
> 
> On 17-Sep-2014, at 6:41 pm, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> ... and we would have to consider all other theme frameworks/"starter" themes/flavor-of-the-day code bases special treatment queues as well.
>> 
>> Using a "common" code base and core functionality should make the process faster in general but to create favoritism for them could also lead to more "cookie-cutter" submissions. I would much prefer to give that favoritism to those authors pushing the envelope and thinking outside the box with their code.
>> 
>> Sure, use those code bases for inspiration and ideas but I would think it is much more beneficial to the community and the WordPress project as a whole to reach beyond them ... at least as far as the themes being submitted to the repository goes. The repository is to be a showcase of WordPress, not a new Zen Garden.
>> 
>> Edward Caissie
>> aka Cais.
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Would be nice if there is a separate queue for themes that use _s and customizer, users would get new themes quickly. 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 6:06 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Aside from reviewing based on the Priority reports it is also the most fair process to review on a first come first served basis. Although your idea of picking the "same author randomly because of the ease and understanding" is interesting it really is not fair to those authors you would be skipping over.
>> 
>> Edward Caissie
>> aka Cais.
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 2:49 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> No limit on number of tickets you can review these days.
>> 
>> 
>> On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 12:16 PM, Qamar Ashraf <life.object at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hello to Admins,
>> 
>> I have noticed a lot of new themes in Priority # 4. I am going to review the themes after a couple of months.  I need help on some points,
>> 
>> Is there any change in rules ?
>> 
>> Can i pick theme directly from Priority # 4 ?
>> Is it really needed to close at least 5 tickets before picking the next one ? ** Because, some theme authors do not respond in time so it will be delay in closing ticket.
>> Can i pick themes from same author randomly because of the ease and understanding of code ?
>> 
>> Waiting for your kind response.
>> Thanks
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140918/1ee0f4c5/attachment-0001.html>