[theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 52, Issue 13

rachelle salvadora rachellesalvadora at gmail.com
Wed Sep 3 08:01:21 UTC 2014 

Hi. I have a question.
Can anybody tell me how to join this channel?
https://irclogs.wordpress.org/chanlog.php?channel=wordpress-themes&day=2014-08-26&sort=asc#m106404
I really want to know more about WordPress themes. Thanks.


On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 9:22 AM, <theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
> wrote:

> Send theme-reviewers mailing list submissions to
>         theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         theme-reviewers-request at lists.wordpress.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         theme-reviewers-owner at lists.wordpress.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of theme-reviewers digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Tuesday's meeting (Tammie Lister)
>    2. Re: Tuesday's meeting (Srikanth Koneru)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 00:16:07 +0100
> From: Tammie Lister <karmatosed at gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion list for WordPress theme reviewers."
>         <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Tuesday's meeting
> Message-ID:
>         <CAPb4tGxshjhv6KXZgQxBJivp7VN21xy_KYRQ2aDCJhE=
> cBzyeA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Yes I am up for it. Thanks for the opportunity.
>
> Tammie
>
> On Wednesday, September 3, 2014, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>
> > ?Progress... ?Srikanth, Tammie, Jose, are you up for it?
> >
> > If so the next step would be to ask Otto to help us out (time permitting
> > of course).
> > Your role is to go over approved themes and mark them live.
> >
> > Sounds good?
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com
> > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tskk79 at gmail.com');>> wrote:
> >
> >> so any progress ?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','emil at uzelac.me');>> wrote:
> >>
> >>> The role contains the option to mark themes live, along with what
> >>> reviewer already does and is able to do.
> >>>
> >>> Think of it as the add-on.
> >>>
> >>> No need to make any restrictions or speculate conflict :)
> >>>
> >>> On Friday, August 29, 2014, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com
> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','tskk79 at gmail.com');>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Not sure what conflict with WordPress.org you are talking about but
> the
> >>>> conflict I had in mind is this :
> >>>> Themeshop owner/employee has his/their themes in new/updated list and
> >>>> they may delay the next push as long as possible to get as much
> exposure of
> >>>> being on theme directory as possible, even if he is genuinely busy,
> others
> >>>> may interpret it that way.
> >>>>
> >>>> So in my opinion neutral person should be first preference, just an
> >>>> opinion.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Philip Arthur Moore <
> >>>> philip at pressbuild.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> If you find a completely neutral, unbiased, amazing theme reviewer
> >>>>> good enough for WordPress.org who does not own a theme shop or make
> >>>>> themes that would in any way "conflict" with WordPress.org, let me
> >>>>> know. I've been looking for unicorns.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> > I guess stepping stone in figurative pyramid comment gave me wrong
> >>>>> idea.
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Chip Bennett <
> chip at chipbennett.net>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> Here's my take on (and original intent for proposing) the role of
> >>>>> "trusted
> >>>>> >> reviewer": they are reviewers who are experienced enough, and who
> >>>>> perform
> >>>>> >> thorough and complete enough reviews, to be *trusted* to push
> >>>>> approved
> >>>>> >> themes Live - either directly (in the case of their own tickets)
> or
> >>>>> >> indirectly (in the case of the admin review queue.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> No more, no less. Not a "path to admin", not a title or
> >>>>> recognition. Just
> >>>>> >> those competent to push themes live.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> It's also not a status symbol or exclusive club. As far as I'm
> >>>>> concerned,
> >>>>> >> it should be something available to every single reviewer.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> The whole point is to facilitate the review process while ensuring
> >>>>> that
> >>>>> >> themes with critical issues don't end up in end users' hands.
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> On Aug 28, 2014 5:38 PM, "Jose Castaneda" <jomcastaneda at gmail.com
> >
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>> As some of you are aware, and even attended, our meeting on
> >>>>> tuesday went
> >>>>> >>> good. If you would like to read the logs:
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>>
> https://irclogs.wordpress.org/chanlog.php?channel=wordpress-themes&day=2014-08-26&sort=asc#m106404
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>> The basis of the meeting was to define the role of a key/trusted
> >>>>> >>> reviewer. That person will have the ability to push themes live
> >>>>> but not the
> >>>>> >>> ability to assign tickets, sort of a sub-admin type of role. As
> >>>>> Cais
> >>>>> >>> mentioned the key things the admins are looking for are:
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>> * experience
> >>>>> >>> * community involvement
> >>>>> >>> * high quality reviews
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>> He also notes that he, and the other admins, would love more
> >>>>> feedback.
> >>>>> >>> Seriously, I cannot emphasize that part enough, folks. The more
> >>>>> feedback we
> >>>>> >>> provide the better we are as a team. It can't all be one sided. I
> >>>>> know there
> >>>>> >>> have been a few that speak up from time to time and some that
> hold
> >>>>> back.
> >>>>> >>> This is your time to have your voice heard and make an impact on
> >>>>> not just
> >>>>> >>> our team but the entire WordPress project because of this.
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>> What other things do you want to add to the list of criteria?
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>> >>>
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>> >>
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>> >
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org');>
> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org');>
> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>
> >>
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140903/ea147c93/attachment-0001.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Message: 2
> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 04:52:56 +0530
> From: Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
> To: "Discussion list for WordPress theme reviewers."
>         <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Tuesday's meeting
> Message-ID:
>         <
> CAL9qNWu7wmJ5agArTAs1BLnLgx+FgoTLv70+RuRL4Fwj7yoBoQ at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
>
> Sure I am also up for it, also @samuelsidler offered to make the code
> changes in case Otto is busy.
>
>
> On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Tammie Lister <karmatosed at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Yes I am up for it. Thanks for the opportunity.
> >
> > Tammie
> >
> >
> > On Wednesday, September 3, 2014, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
> >
> >> ?Progress... ?Srikanth, Tammie, Jose, are you up for it?
> >>
> >> If so the next step would be to ask Otto to help us out (time permitting
> >> of course).
> >> Your role is to go over approved themes and mark them live.
> >>
> >> Sounds good?
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Sep 2, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> so any progress ?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The role contains the option to mark themes live, along with what
> >>>> reviewer already does and is able to do.
> >>>>
> >>>> Think of it as the add-on.
> >>>>
> >>>> No need to make any restrictions or speculate conflict :)
> >>>>
> >>>> On Friday, August 29, 2014, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Not sure what conflict with WordPress.org you are talking about but
> >>>>> the conflict I had in mind is this :
> >>>>> Themeshop owner/employee has his/their themes in new/updated list and
> >>>>> they may delay the next push as long as possible to get as much
> exposure of
> >>>>> being on theme directory as possible, even if he is genuinely busy,
> others
> >>>>> may interpret it that way.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> So in my opinion neutral person should be first preference, just an
> >>>>> opinion.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Philip Arthur Moore <
> >>>>> philip at pressbuild.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> If you find a completely neutral, unbiased, amazing theme reviewer
> >>>>>> good enough for WordPress.org who does not own a theme shop or make
> >>>>>> themes that would in any way "conflict" with WordPress.org, let me
> >>>>>> know. I've been looking for unicorns.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> > I guess stepping stone in figurative pyramid comment gave me wrong
> >>>>>> idea.
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Chip Bennett <
> chip at chipbennett.net>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> Here's my take on (and original intent for proposing) the role of
> >>>>>> "trusted
> >>>>>> >> reviewer": they are reviewers who are experienced enough, and who
> >>>>>> perform
> >>>>>> >> thorough and complete enough reviews, to be *trusted* to push
> >>>>>> approved
> >>>>>> >> themes Live - either directly (in the case of their own tickets)
> or
> >>>>>> >> indirectly (in the case of the admin review queue.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> No more, no less. Not a "path to admin", not a title or
> >>>>>> recognition. Just
> >>>>>> >> those competent to push themes live.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> It's also not a status symbol or exclusive club. As far as I'm
> >>>>>> concerned,
> >>>>>> >> it should be something available to every single reviewer.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> The whole point is to facilitate the review process while
> ensuring
> >>>>>> that
> >>>>>> >> themes with critical issues don't end up in end users' hands.
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> On Aug 28, 2014 5:38 PM, "Jose Castaneda" <
> jomcastaneda at gmail.com>
> >>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> As some of you are aware, and even attended, our meeting on
> >>>>>> tuesday went
> >>>>>> >>> good. If you would like to read the logs:
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>>
> https://irclogs.wordpress.org/chanlog.php?channel=wordpress-themes&day=2014-08-26&sort=asc#m106404
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> The basis of the meeting was to define the role of a key/trusted
> >>>>>> >>> reviewer. That person will have the ability to push themes live
> >>>>>> but not the
> >>>>>> >>> ability to assign tickets, sort of a sub-admin type of role. As
> >>>>>> Cais
> >>>>>> >>> mentioned the key things the admins are looking for are:
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> * experience
> >>>>>> >>> * community involvement
> >>>>>> >>> * high quality reviews
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> He also notes that he, and the other admins, would love more
> >>>>>> feedback.
> >>>>>> >>> Seriously, I cannot emphasize that part enough, folks. The more
> >>>>>> feedback we
> >>>>>> >>> provide the better we are as a team. It can't all be one sided.
> I
> >>>>>> know there
> >>>>>> >>> have been a few that speak up from time to time and some that
> >>>>>> hold back.
> >>>>>> >>> This is your time to have your voice heard and make an impact on
> >>>>>> not just
> >>>>>> >>> our team but the entire WordPress project because of this.
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> What other things do you want to add to the list of criteria?
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>> >>>
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>> >>
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> > _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>> >
> >>>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <
> http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140903/63f0a7f8/attachment.html
> >
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 52, Issue 13
> ***********************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140903/c5493cc3/attachment-0001.html>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list