[theme-reviewers] Tuesday's meeting

[Srikanth Koneru]

so any progress ?


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:18 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:

> The role contains the option to mark themes live, along with what reviewer
> already does and is able to do.
>
> Think of it as the add-on.
>
> No need to make any restrictions or speculate conflict :)
>
> On Friday, August 29, 2014, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Not sure what conflict with WordPress.org you are talking about but the
>> conflict I had in mind is this :
>> Themeshop owner/employee has his/their themes in new/updated list and
>> they may delay the next push as long as possible to get as much exposure of
>> being on theme directory as possible, even if he is genuinely busy, others
>> may interpret it that way.
>>
>> So in my opinion neutral person should be first preference, just an
>> opinion.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Philip Arthur Moore <
>> philip at pressbuild.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If you find a completely neutral, unbiased, amazing theme reviewer
>>> good enough for WordPress.org who does not own a theme shop or make
>>> themes that would in any way "conflict" with WordPress.org, let me
>>> know. I've been looking for unicorns.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I guess stepping stone in figurative pyramid comment gave me wrong
>>> idea.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Here's my take on (and original intent for proposing) the role of
>>> "trusted
>>> >> reviewer": they are reviewers who are experienced enough, and who
>>> perform
>>> >> thorough and complete enough reviews, to be *trusted* to push approved
>>> >> themes Live - either directly (in the case of their own tickets) or
>>> >> indirectly (in the case of the admin review queue.
>>> >>
>>> >> No more, no less. Not a "path to admin", not a title or recognition.
>>> Just
>>> >> those competent to push themes live.
>>> >>
>>> >> It's also not a status symbol or exclusive club. As far as I'm
>>> concerned,
>>> >> it should be something available to every single reviewer.
>>> >>
>>> >> The whole point is to facilitate the review process while ensuring
>>> that
>>> >> themes with critical issues don't end up in end users' hands.
>>> >>
>>> >> On Aug 28, 2014 5:38 PM, "Jose Castaneda" <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> As some of you are aware, and even attended, our meeting on tuesday
>>> went
>>> >>> good. If you would like to read the logs:
>>> >>>
>>> https://irclogs.wordpress.org/chanlog.php?channel=wordpress-themes&day=2014-08-26&sort=asc#m106404
>>> >>>
>>> >>> The basis of the meeting was to define the role of a key/trusted
>>> >>> reviewer. That person will have the ability to push themes live but
>>> not the
>>> >>> ability to assign tickets, sort of a sub-admin type of role. As Cais
>>> >>> mentioned the key things the admins are looking for are:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> * experience
>>> >>> * community involvement
>>> >>> * high quality reviews
>>> >>>
>>> >>> He also notes that he, and the other admins, would love more
>>> feedback.
>>> >>> Seriously, I cannot emphasize that part enough, folks. The more
>>> feedback we
>>> >>> provide the better we are as a team. It can't all be one sided. I
>>> know there
>>> >>> have been a few that speak up from time to time and some that hold
>>> back.
>>> >>> This is your time to have your voice heard and make an impact on not
>>> just
>>> >>> our team but the entire WordPress project because of this.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> What other things do you want to add to the list of criteria?
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140902/2ed56644/attachment.html>