[theme-reviewers] Tackling long review times

[Srikanth Koneru]

Inspire others by reviewing a ton of themes :)

On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 7:08 PM, myazalea <myazalea at hotmail.com> wrote:

>  I still believe that making it easier for authors to submit higher
> quality themes is the way to go.
> The guidelines have to be clear. I got fed up after having pretty much
> every ticket I reviewed reopened because of things that were not marked as
> required.
>
>
>
>  Skickat från min Samsung Mobil
>
>
> -------- Originalmeddelande --------
> Från: Srikanth Koneru
> Datum:29-10-2014 14:30 (GMT+01:00)
> Till: "Discussion list for WordPress theme reviewers."
> Rubrik: Re: [theme-reviewers] Tackling long review times
>
>  no aggression, just stating the fact :)
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:57 PM, Afzaal (ThinkUpThemes) <
> wordpress at thinkupthemes.com> wrote:
>
>  Wow, wasn’t expecting such aggression. Just sharing thoughts Srikanth. J
>
>
>
> Love to hear your thoughts as mentioned. Do you think it’s beneficial to
> end users to have a broken theme and for us to not have this discussion?
>
>
>
> *From:* theme-reviewers [mailto:
> theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] *On Behalf Of *Srikanth
> Koneru
> *Sent:* 29 October 2014 13:24
> *To:* Discussion list for WordPress theme reviewers.
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Tackling long review times
>
>
>
> Instead of wasting time monitoring the percentages, its more beneficial to
> actually review themes.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 6:43 PM, Afzaal (ThinkUpThemes) <
> wordpress at thinkupthemes.com> wrote:
>
> Hello all,
>
>
>
> I just wanted to share some thoughts and hear the thoughts from others on
> possible methods for tackling the long wait time for theme reviews.
> Although long wait times are less of an issue for new themes, I’m more
> concerned with the recent increase in wait times for theme updates. Often
> updates are released to fix issues and in an ideal world it would be great
> to have these reach users quickly.
>
>
>
> In a recent discussion Tammie applauded SiteOrigin for their commitment in
> allocating 5% of their resources to assist with WordPress.org activities. I
> definitely believe that anyone benefitting financially from WordPress.org
> should in recognition of this opportunity allocate some of their resources
> back to WordPress.org. Anything at all would be beneficial.
>
>
>
> So here’s my proposal. Any author that submits a theme (either new or
> update) should first complete a review before that theme itself can be
> reviewed.
>
>
>
> The benefits of this are:
>
>
>
> ·         Reduce the wait time in the review queue.
>
> ·         More themes will be reviewed by experienced developers (those
> who themselves have developed a theme for acceptance to WP.org
>
> ·         Help to make the reviewer a better developer.
>
>
>
> As an initial thought the number of reviews that the author must complete
> will be a percentage based on the number of themes ahead of them in the
> review queue.
>
>
>
> ·         New Theme – Review 2%. E.g if you are approximately at position
> 100, kindly review 2 new themes.
>
> ·         Theme update – Review 10%. E.g if you are approximately at
> position 60, kindly review 6 updates.
>
>
>
> I know that this is a very rough estimate, and yes the absolute value
> calculated from the percentage will vary as each new review is picked up.
> However, I’d like to think we can be trusted to broadly follow any
> guidelines we may agree upon.
>
>
>
> Love to hear your thoughts! J
>
>
>
> Afzaal
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20141029/e94ca4b1/attachment.html>