[theme-reviewers] Unique Slug for Theme

[Chip Bennett]

Just FYI: the reason for the function-prefixing requirement is to ensure
that Theme-defined functions have as little likelihood as possible of
clashing with core- or Plugin-defined functions. There's no particular need
to be completely dogmatic about the function prefixes all being exactly the
same; if that's something that we need to clarify in the Guidelines, let me
know, and I'll address it.


On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:02 PM, Stephen Cui <scui2005 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Found the link: http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2012/03/14/theme-
>  frameworks-and-namespacing-guidelines/
>
> You are the correct - I mean function prefix.
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Justin Tadlock <justin at justintadlock.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm not sure about the link.  Generally, yes, a theme can have more than
>> one *prefix* for function names (assuming this is what you mean rather than
>> slug) when including third-party code bases like drop-in frameworks.
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jun 29, 2014 at 11:06 AM, Stephen Cui <scui2005 at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I remembered a theme allowed to have more one unique slug if a core
>>> framework is used. I cannot find the entry in TRT discussion. Does anyone
>>> have the link?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Stephen
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140629/5389a9dc/attachment.html>