[theme-reviewers] Theme Names

[Emil Uzelac]

Dictionary is policing the names and no need to do that. We have to come up
with something better.


On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:54 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:

> We can't do anything about existing themes, we should try and avoid these
> conflicts in future if we can.
> I was thinking of only English dictionary, other language words will sound
> made up and will result in few conflicts if any.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:20 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
>
>> But my point is that such a guideline is demonstrably implausible,
>> because, if applied to the current set of hosted Themes, would result in
>> almost every single one failing. Thus, the likelihood of *future* Themes
>> failing the Guideline would be expected to be commensurate.
>>
>> Also: what dictionary? Just English dictionaries? What about dictionaries
>> of other languages? What about dead languages?
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> not with retrospective effect ofcourse.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:12 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> ...which would eliminate about 99% of the Themes in the directory?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:39 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> no dictionary words?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:08 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Back to my previous question: what would you suggest as the
>>>>>> objective, enforceable guideline for Theme names?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:23 PM, Catch Themes <info at catchthemes.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Many of theme shop use common names like Box, Responsive, Awesome
>>>>>>> and so on. So, this means we can play with theses name by adding word
>>>>>>> before or after.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yes Otto, I agree with you that Box is common name and I am just
>>>>>>> asking this question so that we are clear about the naming rules. This will
>>>>>>> help me in further Theme Reviews as well.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thank you all for your reply. I hope we will have clear guideline in
>>>>>>> this soon.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 12:00 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jun 26, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Catch Themes <info at catchthemes.com
>>>>>>>> > wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It's the matter of choices of theme name and manipulation. I feel
>>>>>>>>> The Box is so much manipulating Catch Box name.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you can definitively show that to be true, then you have a
>>>>>>>> point, however, I don't see what your evidence for this could possibly be.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> If you're reacting based just on the similarity of the name, then I
>>>>>>>> have to point out that "Box" is a pretty normal and commonplace English
>>>>>>>> word, popular even in movies: http://youtu.be/0cmqwbZa6_w
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, other than the name being similar, how is it "manipulating"
>>>>>>>> anything? Is it using the same code? Is it a derivative of the other Box
>>>>>>>> theme? Is there *anything else in common at all* other than the name and
>>>>>>>> the fact that they're both, you know, themes?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The name may not be a good choice, but this is not really evidence
>>>>>>>> of anything other than both parties lack of creativity in naming things.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Otto
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140626/686a3614/attachment.html>