[theme-reviewers] Options Tree Framework: Group Review Project

[Dylan Scott]

Hi Chip,

After some of the reviews I've done I've found options frameworks a bit
infuriating to review as everything seems to be buried and difficult to
find. Has anyone else found this? Or I am just new to the process and way
of thinking with a framework?

Kind Regards



On 25 June 2014 15:28, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> I think the ThemeForest-sponsored Options Tree framework (
> https://github.com/valendesigns/option-tree ) needs a detailed vetting,
> as I'm seeing it used in several Themes, and note at least two issues:
>
> 1. Saving default settings to the database (not using sane defaults)
> 2. Multiple wp_options entries (multiple register_setting() and
> update_option() calls, based on single-setting ID)
>
> I don't have time at the moment to go through the framework at the level
> of detail needed (doing the best I can, just to keep the approval queue in
> reasonable shape), so I thought it might be a good idea to make a group
> project out of it. Anyone who wants to practice reviewing an options
> framework, and who has time to contribute, please dig through it, and post
> any comments here.
>
> The purpose here is two-fold: to review this specific framework, and also
> to provide an opportunity for new reviewers for whom review of such code
> might seem daunting. So, let's see how it goes!
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140625/b9a0663d/attachment.html>