emil at uzelac.me
Wed Jun 4 20:09:59 UTC 2014
Not a problem Sami!
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 2:59 PM, Sami Keijonen <sami.keijonen at foxnet.fi>
> Thanks Emil for the info.
> I hope I'm not the only one who is always confused what it comes to
> licences, images in this case. It's like quantum physics: everybody can
> talk about it but nobody really understands it.
> On 4 June 2014 21:06, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>> Hey guys,
>> I was thinking to write a post about it, but I chose the list instead.
>> As I was going over some license *issues* with my very own work, it
>> turns out that sites like http://unsplash.com/ are completely unreliable
>> and probably not the best choice to use images from.
>> The site itself does not have an explicit license, other than a line
>> where it says "All photos CC0", which is definitely not enough.
>> Should we "police" this? You bet!
>> All right, so I took few extra steps and came to conclusion that the
>> original license and the license http://unsplash.com/ advertise are
>> In most cases the license are either not CC0, or they require a special
>> permission by the owner and in some other cases released under CC and we
>> all know that CC alone is not GPL-Compatible. Not to mention that sites
>> lists images from people that don't even exist.
>> When that special permission is granted the source needs to have that in
>> writing, otherwise "All photos CC0" means nothing to us.
>> Best example:
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Sami Keijonen
> Fox Holding Oy
> sami.keijonen at foxnet.fi
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the theme-reviewers