[theme-reviewers] Payment Option for Theme Reviews

[Emil Uzelac]

Getting more folks involved will solve many issues :)


On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:10 PM, Michael Hebenstreit <michael at mhthemes.com>
wrote:

> As stated before, unfortunately not. But as stated before, it seems
> volunteer work doesn’t work well anymore and it might be the time to think
> about new solutions. Don’t get me wrong, I don’t have a problem with
> waiting a few weeks for theme approval and I fully respect the work of all
> reviewers and admins. But when we are honest and rational, we have to admit
> that this doesn’t work well. If this would be a company and the review
> queue would be client issues, we wouldn’t do our job very well. :-)
>
>
> Am 31.07.2014 um 22:04 schrieb Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>:
>
> Have you helped with the queue yet?
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 3:01 PM, Michael Hebenstreit <michael at mhthemes.com
> > wrote:
>
>> That doesn’t help the review queue and also won’t mark themes as live.
>> :-)
>>
>>
>> Am 31.07.2014 um 21:58 schrieb Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me>:
>>
>> And you can get paid for reviews too, just go to
>> http://jobs.wordpress.net/ and problem solved ;)
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 2:52 PM, Michael Hebenstreit <
>>> michael at mhthemes.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> At the moment it seems that a lot of unexperienced reviewers are being
>>>> motivated on WordCamps around the world. They review a few themes during
>>>> the contribution day and then it’s over (in most cases).
>>>>
>>>> WordCamps aren't recruitment drives. Those sessions should be entirely
>>> for the benefit of the people there, not for any other purpose. Our goal at
>>> WordCamps, overall, is to educate and inform (and meet and greet and BBQ
>>> and so on).
>>>
>>> If showing somebody how the theme review works and having them do one
>>> for hands on experience helps them in any way, then that was the point.
>>> Whether the result is useful to us or not is irrelevant, we only care
>>> whether or not it was useful for that person.
>>>
>>> Wordcamps are for the Wordcampers. If they decide to continue reviewing,
>>> great. If not, that's okay too.
>>>
>>> -Otto
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140731/befc6bb9/attachment-0001.html>