[theme-reviewers] Theme Names

Sun Jul 20 14:44:55 UTC 2014

Why are you so much bothered about this mate ? If some XYZ theme for this
keyword comes in top rank for this keyword then you don't have any issues
but if wordpress.org themes come, it seems spammy.

If you are raising voice then you should have done that earlier because you
joined the community approx 1 year ago and in this period there are tens of
themes which were contributed keeping SEO names in mind.
You should have convinced the admins to put a system for *theme name*
check.

As per your logic, the username like fasterthemes and themealley are also
spammy because they contain THEME in the names ?

Sorry but very strange logic , my friend !

On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 7:34 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Ofcourse you don't agree, "Premium Photography Theme" is a great keyword
> and your theme www.wordpress.org/themes/premium-photography/ will rank #1
> or #2
>
> one look at the url name www.wordpress.org/themes/premium-photography/
> and anyone can see how spammy it looks.
>
>
> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 6:09 PM, FasterThemes <support at fasterthemes.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Mate.
>> I don't agree to you here.
>> People should be free to use Any theme name of their choice if it doesn't
>> violate any copyright issues.
>> For e.g. Responsive is a theme with MAX downloads. One of the reason is
>> that it comes in top 3 for RESPONSIVE WORDPRESS THEMES in Google. I
>> don't think the first  theme author (Emil) didn't break any rule giving it
>> this name.
>> He was smart enough to choose a name earlier than all of us.
>> We shouldn't bother about theme names until they breach any copyright
>> issues.
>> As far as using WordPress.ORG's domain authority is concerned, we all are
>> part of it and we are contributing to its growth hence there shouldn't be
>> any issues using it. In Contrast, I think we all should use easy to
>> remember theme names which make sense :)
>> Feel free to share your thoughts in this. :)
>> P.S. No offense meant to anyone :)
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 20, 2014 at 4:56 PM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If you take a look at https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/report/4 you
>>> will notice that the keyword name menace(premium photography, win8 metro
>>> style, the magazine, bootstrap-on, sans-serif, mobile first, design
>>> furniture) is growing and its purpose is to abuse the domain authority of
>>> wordpress.org in Google, one remedy is to ask those theme authors to
>>> remove all branding, credit link and pro upgrade links, that will certainly
>>> demotivate such tactics.
>>>
>>> This can be applied to already live themes too.
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 8:07 PM, Peter Kakoma <kakomap at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hehehe. Good points. Agreed
>>>> On 27 Jun 2014 17:20, "Chip Bennett" <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> There are some huge differences:
>>>>>
>>>>> 1) Apple owns the entire App store
>>>>> 2) Apple has an army of paid staffers to enforce their guidelines
>>>>>
>>>>> WPORG does not own the sole distribution means for Themes, and I would
>>>>> prefer that the limited time available to the reviewers enforcing the
>>>>> Guidelines be spent on things far more important/beneficial than conducting
>>>>> Google searches of Theme names.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 9:17 AM, Peter Kakoma <kakomap at gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I do largely agree with all that's been said, particularly what Chip,
>>>>>> Emil & Bryan said. However, allow me to throw a spanner in the works.
>>>>>> This isn't a new issue so we wouldn't have to re-invent the wheel.
>>>>>> The Apple store has some guidelines and so does the Google Play store (and
>>>>>> basically all stores that accept stuff from developers)
>>>>>> To quote the play store guidelines: (edited to leave the bit that
>>>>>> matters the most here)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *Impersonation or Deceptive Behavior:* Apps must not have names or
>>>>>> icons that appear confusingly similar to existing products, or to apps
>>>>>> supplied with the device
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Checking if a name has been used before is a simple Google search;
>>>>>> takes no more than 1 minutes I think.
>>>>>>  https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=box+site:wordpress.org%2Fthemes
>>>>>> One basically prefixes the search term with
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> *site:wordpress.org/themes <http://wordpress.org/themes> *
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Jun 27, 2014 at 4:49 AM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here's what I replied with to the other discussion (didn't realize
>>>>>>> there was a bigger one at hand):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> "I agree, it's theme developer's responsibility to not infringe on
>>>>>>> trademarks and trademark holder's responsibility to protect their
>>>>>>> trademarks, but impossible for the theme review team (except for in
>>>>>>> extremely obvious cases) to check for or inform of possible trademark
>>>>>>> issues."
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's the only logical solution. In other words, in the rare event
>>>>>>> that this issue comes up, I'm sure it will be dealt with by the parties
>>>>>>> involved or brought to WordPress directly to have the infringing content
>>>>>>> removed. But, having the team go as far as to Google the theme name to see
>>>>>>> if it's already been used or check against the USPTO would be insane,
>>>>>>> that's the theme developer's due diligence to make sure their theme/product
>>>>>>> names are unique and original, as in not taken.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://kakoma.ug
>>>>>> http:somanystories.ug <http://somanystories.ug>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140720/b9458f48/attachment.html>