[theme-reviewers] Contribution days

[Tammie Lister]

I think that is a great idea Chip. Having a non-admin 'mid' role I think
would help a lot. I feel it also has the nice effect of something for
people to aim towards. I'd hope it would encourage more. It also brings
more hands on deck for allocating themes and making live. Which maybe would
help admins?

John, I'm less keen on that idea of a month long residency. We already have
team reps and admins, for me that fits the bill there. The mid role that
Chip is suggesting makes more sense to me.

Tammie

On Monday, July 14, 2014, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> I think a "Trusted Reviewer" would be a better approach: reviewers who can
> approve *AND* push live the Themes they review.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:19 PM, John Wilson <mail at johnwilsononline.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','mail at johnwilsononline.com');>> wrote:
>
>> I like the sound of an 'Admin for the day', I bet it would really help at
>> contributor days when time is already precious.
>>
>> Just putting it out there, but what about admin for a month? Experienced
>> reviewers who can be trusted and are willing to sacrifice more time short
>> term to focus on supporting Contributor Days, lightening the work load of
>> full time administrators, pushing approved themes through quicker and
>> working on review guidelines & support materials for the rest of the theme
>> reviewers.
>>
>> Maybe the Theme Review Team's equivalent of Core's Release Lead?
>>
>> Sent from my iPhone
>>
>> On 14 Jul 2014, at 22:09, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','edward.caissie at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>> I think "Admin For The Day" (or weekend, as the case may be) would be a
>> very interesting idea to explore.
>>
>> Edward Caissie
>> aka Cais.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 4:13 PM, Tammie Lister <karmatosed at gmail.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','karmatosed at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>
>>> Ha! Yes you American's with your wrong timezone ;)
>>>
>>> I agree about the advance, that makes sense.
>>>
>>> Tammie
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 9:08 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','otto at ottodestruct.com');>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 2:57 PM, Tammie Lister <karmatosed at gmail.com
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','karmatosed at gmail.com');>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> That would rock Otto. Thanks for the suggestion.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> BTW, the "in advance" thing is a bit important. On at least one
>>>> occasion, a WordCamp needed my help for something on .org, while I was
>>>> asleep. Europe is a bit of a different timezone, you see. :)
>>>>
>>>> But if we know, then we can get you set up in advance and make sure you
>>>> know how it works and how to use it.
>>>>
>>>> -Otto
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org');>
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org');>
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org');>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org');>
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140714/f3acbcc3/attachment-0001.html>