[theme-reviewers] Why Rigorous Review of Theme Functional Files is Important
Srikanth Koneru
tskk79 at gmail.com
Thu Jan 30 16:35:44 UTC 2014
If i add 'capability' => 'unfiltered_html' then can i skip
'sanitize_callback' => 'prefix_sanitize_integer' ?
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:04 PM, Rohit Tripathi <rohitink at live.com> wrote:
> Thanks Koveshenin.
>
> So, if I make the The option of Custom Js available only to users with
> unfiltered_html capability, then the themes are good to go, right?
>
>
>
> > Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 20:19:39 +0400
> > From: kovshenin at gmail.com
>
> > To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Why Rigorous Review of Theme Functional
> Files is Important
> >
> > > I have just allowed the <script> tag in the text area. Is the script
> tag not acceptable at all? Or should I create a New Field, derivate of
> Textfield, and allow <script> in that?
> >
> > As Justin pointed out earlier, you should be checking whether the
> > current user can publish unfiltered html, and only then show your
> > custom js fields that allow script tags. Note that an some setups,
> > neither admins nor super admins have the unfiltered_html capability
> > for security reasons.
> >
> > Also, in my opinion, Custom CSS and especially Custom JS should not be
> > allowed in themes.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 8:14 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
> > > Speaking in general terms, any Theme option must be properly
> > > sanitized/validated on input, and escaped on output, as appropriate.
> > > Specific sanitization/validation/escaping methods depend on the
> specific
> > > data type.
> > >
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Rohit Tripathi <rohitink at live.com>
> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I Use options framework for my theme options. I have just allowed the
> > >> <script> tag in the text area. Is the script tag not acceptable at
> all? Or
> > >> should I create a New Field, derivate of Textfield, and allow
> <script> in
> > >> that?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 11:01:22 -0500
> > >>
> > >> From: chip at chipbennett.net
> > >> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Why Rigorous Review of Theme Functional
> > >> Files is Important
> > >>
> > >> It's example code, to show that an arbitrary script can be executed.
> You
> > >> didn't really expect me to put actually dangerous code there, did
> you? :)
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:58 AM, Rohit Tripathi <rohitink at live.com>
> > >> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I am not sure, if asking this is lame. But, why is the entering
> > >> alert('text') in the header/footer codes area, being considered as an
> issue?
> > >>
> > >> Regards
> > >>
> > >> ________________________________
> > >> Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2014 10:40:22 -0500
> > >> From: chip at chipbennett.net
> > >> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > >> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Why Rigorous Review of Theme Functional
> > >> Files is Important
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> In many cases, the issue is the lack of inherent sanitization when
> using
> > >> the Theme Mods API with the Theme Customizer:
> > >>
> > >>
> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2014/01/30/using-the-theme-customizer-with-the-theme-mods-api/
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:21 AM, Justin Tadlock
> > >> <justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> if ( !current_user_can( 'unfiltered_html' ) ) {
> > >> /* Sanitize. */
> > >> }
> > >>
> > >> All theme reviewers should be intimately familiar with this page:
> > >> http://codex.wordpress.org/Data_Validation
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 1/30/2014 7:00 AM, Chip Bennett wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Good morning, all,
> > >>
> > >> Just as a reminder why it is imperative that our reviews are thorough
> and
> > >> complete, including a review of the Theme code and not merely a
> > >> Theme-Check/front-end review, I woke up this morning to several emails
> > >> reporting various Theme security vulnerabilities. Here's a sampling:
> > >>
> > >> To reproduce:
> > >>
> > >> 1. Add define( 'DISALLOW_UNFILTERED_HTML', true ); to wp-config.php
> > >> 2. Activate the theme, navigate to Theme Options, add an image logo
> > >> 3. In General Options - Logo Text, enter (as is, with quotes): "
> > >> onclick="javascript:alert(1);"
> > >> 4. Visit the homepage, click on the logo, boom.
> > >>
> > >> 5. In Slider Options, add a slider image and use the following for the
> > >> slider text: Foo bar <script>alert('baz');</script>
> > >> 6. Visit the home page, boom.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> To reproduce:
> > >>
> > >> 1. Add define( 'DISALLOW_UNFILTERED_HTML', true ); to wp-config.php
> > >> 2. Activate the theme, go to Appearance - Theme Settings
> > >> 3. In More Text enter: <script>alert('xss');</script>
> > >> 4. Visit the home page.
> > >>
> > >> (you will have to have at least one post with a <!--more--> tag
> > >>
> > >> To reproduce:
> > >>
> > >> 1. Add define( 'DISALLOW_UNFILTERED_HTML', true ); to wp-config.php
> > >> 2. Activate the Theme, navigate to Appearance - Theme
> > >> Options - Social Netowrks Configuration
> > >> 3. In Twitter URL enter: http://twitter.com/kovshenin'
> onclick='alert(1);'
> > >> 4. Visit the home page and click the Twitter icon on the top right,
> > >> ouch. Other URL fields affected too.
> > >>
> > >> 5. In Layout Settings - Footer enter: <script>alert(123)</script>
> > >> 6. Visit the front page, ouch
> > >>
> > >> 7. In Advertise Settings, Header Banner Alternative: '
> onclick='alert(1)'
> > >> 8. Visit the front page and click the header banner, ouch
> > >>
> > >> 9. In Advertise Settings, Header Banner Link: http://foo.com'
> > >> onclick='alert("bar")
> > >> 10. Visit the front page and click the banner
> > >>
> > >> To reproduce:
> > >>
> > >> 11. In Theme Options - Integration
> > >> 12. For header code: <script>alert('wow');</script>
> > >> 13. Body code: <script>alert('seriously?')</script>
> > >> 14. Visit the front page
> > >>
> > >> To reproduce:
> > >>
> > >> 15. in Theme Options - Colors, go to your browser JS console and
> > >> enter: jQuery('#cwp_templates_topbar_colorid_color').val('blue;"
> > >> onclick="javascript:alert(123);')
> > >> 16. Hit save changes, visit the front page
> > >> 17. The top bar is blue, try and click it. Probably all the color
> > >> fields in this theme are vulnerable to this.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> That these issues are appearing is approved/live Themes is exactly the
> > >> reason that it takes so long to get through the approved-Theme queue.
> We
> > >> have to audit for these things, and the audits are turning into
> complete
> > >> re-reviews in several cases.
> > >>
> > >> If you are uncomfortable with performing this level of review - first:
> > >> don't worry. We've all been there. But the important thing is to ask
> for
> > >> help. We have a team of 100 people, most/all of whom would be more
> than
> > >> happy to lend a hand. We've all learned from each other. Post a
> comment
> > >> in-ticket, or post to the mail-list, and ask for guidance. Especially
> when
> > >> it comes to Theme options, Theme code can get quite complex and often
> > >> difficult to follow. Understanding how the Settings API works
> sometimes
> > >> seems like it requires a master's degree. And developers all have
> different
> > >> coding styles. It's completely understandable if someone needs a
> second pair
> > >> of eyes when reviewing a given Theme. So please: ask for help if you
> need it
> > >> when reviewing.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> > >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> > >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers
> mailing
> > >> list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> > >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> > >>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________ theme-reviewers
> mailing
> > >> list theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> theme-reviewers mailing list
> > >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> > >>
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Konstantin
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140130/8265e2d4/attachment.html>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list