[theme-reviewers] Theme naming feedback
Zulfikar Nore
zulfikarnore at live.com
Thu Jan 23 13:33:28 UTC 2014
Great feedback, thank you all.
Got some food for thought - let me digest and will submit the theme soon :)
Date: Thu, 23 Jan 2014 18:56:24 +0530
From: tskk79 at gmail.com
To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme naming feedback
If its not generic marketing term then? there is a new there "Acitpo" its not generic if someone submits a new theme "Acitpo black" should that be allowed?
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 6:52 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
My personal take is that, while we have valid reason to prohibit use of terms like "WordPress", "Theme", "Twenty {Year}", etc., we should otherwise be as open as possible regarding Theme Name terms. If a developer want to use a common term, then the developer assumes all risk associated with use of that term.
So, if someone names a Theme "Marketing Term du Jour", and someone else names their Theme, "Blue Marketing Term du Jour": not our problem. They're distinct Themes in the directory; SVN sees them as distinct Themes. We (WPTRT) don't care otherwise.
Just my opinion...
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 8:14 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
You can use the name "Cobalt", if desired. We can't be quite that
restrictive on naming because otherwise we'd run out of names
eventually.
Still, whether you want to use that name is up to you. Renaming things
before release is easy.
-Otto
On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 3:57 AM, Zulfikar Nore <zulfikarnore at live.com> wrote:
> I've just complete my latest theme: http://www.wpstrapcode.com/cobalt/
> I know I should have checked the repo first before adopting the name.
> http://wordpress.org/themes/cobalt-blue
>
> My question is given there are a few themes in the repo with similar names
> i.e Alpha + : http://wordpress.org/themes/search.php?q=Alpha am I OK to
> go ahead with the name I've chosen or will that be a No No?
>
> The only other issue I can see is the global prefix of cobalt but this
> shouldn't have
> any issue unless there's a plugin with the same prefix.
>
> Your views please :)
>
> Thanks,
> Zulf
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
_______________________________________________
theme-reviewers mailing list
theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
_______________________________________________
theme-reviewers mailing list
theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
_______________________________________________
theme-reviewers mailing list
theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140123/74163fee/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list