[theme-reviewers] License clarification

[Edward Caissie]

Agreed ... I would not consider the statement to be GPL-compatible.

Edward Caissie
aka Cais.


On Mon, Jan 13, 2014 at 12:27 PM, Ulrich Pogson <grapplerulrich at gmail.com>wrote:

> I would say no as there is a restriction. The GPL licence has no
> restriction.
>
> Don’t redistribute these, the set may not be resold or sublicensed.
>
>
> On 13 January 2014 18:25, Zulfikar Nore <zulfikarnore at live.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello team,
>>
>> If a license has the following terms would it be considered as GPL
>> compatible?
>>
>> "Free,* for personal or commercial use* like all the freebies on Succo
>> Design. Don’t redistribute these, the set may not be resold or sublicensed.
>> Please link to this article if you want to spread this set on your blog."
>>
>> That is the license in its entirety.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Zulf
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140113/35fc088b/attachment.html>