[theme-reviewers] Backwards compatibility

Emil Uzelac emil at uzelac.me
Fri Jan 10 21:02:12 UTC 2014


:-)
On Jan 10, 2014 2:54 PM, "Jose Castaneda" <jomcastaneda at gmail.com> wrote:

> Totally understandable. This is why you don't email on no sleep.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 10, 2014, at 12:38 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at uzelac.me> wrote:
>
> ah that, sorry I really misunderstood :|
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 2:33 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> Fixed:
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Code_Quality:
>>
>> (If this appears anywhere else, just let me know.)
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 10, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Is an admin able to update the version number on the required 'must not
>>> provide compat' ?
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140110/035926a6/attachment.html>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list