[theme-reviewers] Tuesday's meeting

[Ulrich Pogson]

@Srikanth How do you define a neutral person?


On 29 August 2014 12:51, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Not sure what conflict with WordPress.org you are talking about but the
> conflict I had in mind is this :
> Themeshop owner/employee has his/their themes in new/updated list and they
> may delay the next push as long as possible to get as much exposure of
> being on theme directory as possible, even if he is genuinely busy, others
> may interpret it that way.
>
> So in my opinion neutral person should be first preference, just an
> opinion.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 7:26 AM, Philip Arthur Moore <
> philip at pressbuild.com> wrote:
>
>> If you find a completely neutral, unbiased, amazing theme reviewer
>> good enough for WordPress.org who does not own a theme shop or make
>> themes that would in any way "conflict" with WordPress.org, let me
>> know. I've been looking for unicorns.
>>
>> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 6:53 AM, Srikanth Koneru <tskk79 at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I guess stepping stone in figurative pyramid comment gave me wrong idea.
>> >
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Here's my take on (and original intent for proposing) the role of
>> "trusted
>> >> reviewer": they are reviewers who are experienced enough, and who
>> perform
>> >> thorough and complete enough reviews, to be *trusted* to push approved
>> >> themes Live - either directly (in the case of their own tickets) or
>> >> indirectly (in the case of the admin review queue.
>> >>
>> >> No more, no less. Not a "path to admin", not a title or recognition.
>> Just
>> >> those competent to push themes live.
>> >>
>> >> It's also not a status symbol or exclusive club. As far as I'm
>> concerned,
>> >> it should be something available to every single reviewer.
>> >>
>> >> The whole point is to facilitate the review process while ensuring that
>> >> themes with critical issues don't end up in end users' hands.
>> >>
>> >> On Aug 28, 2014 5:38 PM, "Jose Castaneda" <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> As some of you are aware, and even attended, our meeting on tuesday
>> went
>> >>> good. If you would like to read the logs:
>> >>>
>> https://irclogs.wordpress.org/chanlog.php?channel=wordpress-themes&day=2014-08-26&sort=asc#m106404
>> >>>
>> >>> The basis of the meeting was to define the role of a key/trusted
>> >>> reviewer. That person will have the ability to push themes live but
>> not the
>> >>> ability to assign tickets, sort of a sub-admin type of role. As Cais
>> >>> mentioned the key things the admins are looking for are:
>> >>>
>> >>> * experience
>> >>> * community involvement
>> >>> * high quality reviews
>> >>>
>> >>> He also notes that he, and the other admins, would love more feedback.
>> >>> Seriously, I cannot emphasize that part enough, folks. The more
>> feedback we
>> >>> provide the better we are as a team. It can't all be one sided. I
>> know there
>> >>> have been a few that speak up from time to time and some that hold
>> back.
>> >>> This is your time to have your voice heard and make an impact on not
>> just
>> >>> our team but the entire WordPress project because of this.
>> >>>
>> >>> What other things do you want to add to the list of criteria?
>> >>>
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140829/16f7d210/attachment.html>