[theme-reviewers] Tuesday's meeting

[Srikanth Koneru]

I guess stepping stone in figurative pyramid comment gave me wrong idea.


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 5:12 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> Here's my take on (and original intent for proposing) the role of "trusted
> reviewer": they are reviewers who are experienced enough, and who perform
> thorough and complete enough reviews, to be *trusted* to push approved
> themes Live - either directly (in the case of their own tickets) or
> indirectly (in the case of the admin review queue.
>
> No more, no less. Not a "path to admin", not a title or recognition. Just
> those competent to push themes live.
>
> It's also not a status symbol or exclusive club. As far as I'm concerned,
> it should be something available to every single reviewer.
>
> The whole point is to facilitate the review process while ensuring that
> themes with critical issues don't end up in end users' hands.
> On Aug 28, 2014 5:38 PM, "Jose Castaneda" <jomcastaneda at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> As some of you are aware, and even attended, our meeting on tuesday went
>> good. If you would like to read the logs:
>> https://irclogs.wordpress.org/chanlog.php?channel=wordpress-themes&day=2014-08-26&sort=asc#m106404
>>
>> The basis of the meeting was to define the role of a key/trusted
>> reviewer. That person will have the ability to push themes live but not the
>> ability to assign tickets, sort of a sub-admin type of role. As Cais
>> mentioned the key things the admins are looking for are:
>>
>> * experience
>> * community involvement
>> * high quality reviews
>>
>> He also notes that he, and the other admins, would love more feedback.
>> Seriously, I cannot emphasize that part enough, folks. The more feedback we
>> provide the better we are as a team. It can't all be one sided. I know
>> there have been a few that speak up from time to time and some that hold
>> back. This is your time to have your voice heard and make an impact on not
>> just our team but the entire WordPress project because of this.
>>
>> What other things do you want to add to the list of criteria?
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140829/008455ad/attachment.html>