[theme-reviewers] Tuesday's meeting

[Srikanth Koneru]

Even if they are best reviewers, I don't think they should be on path to be
an admin, admin team need to be as neutral as possible to avoid conflicts.


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:31 AM, Bryan Hadaway <bhadaway at gmail.com> wrote:

> @Srikanth - "Not having a themeshop to avoid conflict of interest should
> be discussed too in addition to those 3 requirements?" No, that's
> ridiculous. I'd imagine most of the best reviewers are also theme
> developers.
>
> @Trent - I don't think you apply, you are just assigned trusted by an
> admin based on the criteria above. Basically, if you provide a lot of
> reviews AND those reviews are quality, meaning they don't require constant
> admin babysitting to find missed problems.
>
> I don't think I'd ever qualify because even when I have time to review
> which is extremely rare, I still also need assistance from the admins too
> frequently.
>
> On our entire team, I think Ulrich is probably the only one qualified to
> be a trusted reviewer.
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140829/20552f82/attachment.html>