[theme-reviewers] Tuesday's meeting

[Srikanth Koneru]

Not having a themeshop to avoid conflict of interest should be discussed
too in addition to those 3 requirements?


On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 4:24 AM, Trent Lapinski <trent at cyberchimps.com>
wrote:

> How do we apply to be trusted reviewers?
>
> --Trent Lapinski
> =============
> CEO of CyberChimps Inc.
> http://CyberChimps.com
>
> On Aug 28, 2014, at 3:38 PM, Jose Castaneda <jomcastaneda at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> As some of you are aware, and even attended, our meeting on tuesday went
> good. If you would like to read the logs:
> https://irclogs.wordpress.org/chanlog.php?channel=wordpress-themes&day=2014-08-26&sort=asc#m106404
>
> The basis of the meeting was to define the role of a key/trusted reviewer.
> That person will have the ability to push themes live but not the ability
> to assign tickets, sort of a sub-admin type of role. As Cais mentioned the
> key things the admins are looking for are:
>
> * experience
> * community involvement
> * high quality reviews
>
> He also notes that he, and the other admins, would love more feedback.
> Seriously, I cannot emphasize that part enough, folks. The more feedback we
> provide the better we are as a team. It can't all be one sided. I know
> there have been a few that speak up from time to time and some that hold
> back. This is your time to have your voice heard and make an impact on not
> just our team but the entire WordPress project because of this.
>
> What other things do you want to add to the list of criteria?
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20140829/7f4dde64/attachment.html>